Journal of Value Inquiry 22 (2):89-101 (1988)
Act teleological theories are theories that judge an action permissible just in case its outcome is maximally good. It is usually assumed that act teleological theories cannot be @i
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Peter Vallentyne (1987). The Teleological/Deontological Distinction. Journal of Value Inquiry 21 (1):21-32.
Rowland Stout (1996). Things That Happen Because They Should: A Teleological Approach to Action. Oxford University Press.
Douglas W. Portmore (2001). Can an Act-Consequentialist Theory Be Agent Relative? American Philosophical Quarterly 38 (4):363-77.
Alastair Norcross (1997). Good and Bad Actions. Philosophical Review 106 (1):1-34.
Tyler Cowen (2006). The Epistemic Problem Does Not Refute Consequentialism. Utilitas 18 (04):383-.
Douglas W. Portmore (forthcoming). Consequentialism and Moral Rationalism. Oxford Studies in Normative Ethics.
Peter Vallentyne (2006). Against Maximizing Act-Consequentialism (June 30, 2008). In James Dreier (ed.), Contemporary Debates in Moral Theories. Blackwell Publishers.
Peter Vallentyne (2006). Against Maximizing Act-Consequentialism (December 2, 2010) in Moral Theories Edited by Jamie Dreier (Blackwell Publishers, 2006), Pp. 21-37. [REVIEW] In Dreier Jamie (ed.), Contemporary Debates in Moral Theories. Blackwell Publishers.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads9 ( #115,463 of 556,837 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #64,847 of 556,837 )
How can I increase my downloads?