A dynamic model of interdisciplinarity: Limits and possibilities of interdisciplinary research into law
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
In the paper we will explore some of the major limits and possibilities of interdisciplinary research into law. In how far is the science of law open to insights from other disciplines, such as sociology, psychology, philosophy, economics and literature studies? We will approach this question by confronting two contrary positions: pragmatism (Dewey) that argues for the fundamental comparability and compatibility of theories on the one hand and positivism (Kelsen and Luhmann) that points to the limits thereof on the other. Following on this debate, we will present a dynamic model of interdisciplinarity in which different types of interdisciplinary legal research will be presented, moving from the monodisciplinary towards a fully integrated interdisciplinary perspective. Finally, the advantages and disadvantages of each type of interdisciplinary research into law will be discussed.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library||
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Jennifer G. Jesse (2011). Reflections on the Benefits and Risks of Interdisciplinary Study in Theology, Philosophy, and Literature. American Journal of Theology and Philosophy 32 (1):62 - 73.
Wim J. Steen (1990). Interdisciplinary Integration in Biology? An Overview. Acta Biotheoretica 38 (1).
Ahti-Veikko Pietarinen (2006). Interdisciplinarity and Peirce's Classification of the Sciences: A Centennial Reassessment. Perspectives on Science 14 (2):127-152.
Maurice A. M. de Wachter (1982). Interdisciplinary Bioethics: But Where Do We Start?: A Reflection on Epochè as Method. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 7 (3):275-288.
Erika Mattila (2005). Interdisciplinarity "in the Making": Modeling Infectious Diseases. Perspectives on Science 13 (4):531-553.
Jorge Luis Nicolas Audy & Marília Morosini (eds.) (2007). Innovation and Interdisciplinarity in the University =. Edipucrs.
Mathias M. Siems, The Taxonomy of Interdisciplinary Legal Research: Finding the Way Out of the Desert.
Joachim Schummer (2004). Interdisciplinary Issues in Nanoscale Research. In Baird D. (ed.), Discovering the Nanoscale. Ios. 9--20.
Robert Frodeman (ed.) (2010). The Oxford Handbook of Interdisciplinarity. Oxford University Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads27 ( #72,746 of 1,411,338 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #155,015 of 1,411,338 )
How can I increase my downloads?