David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 1 (2):227-254 (1998)
The central thesis of this paper is that, for most issues of multiculturalism, regarding them as a problem of tolerance puts us on the wrong track because there are certain biases inherent in the principle of tolerance. These biases – individualism, combined with a focus on religion and a focus on beliefs rather than on persons or practices – can be regarded as distinctly Protestant. Extending the scope of tolerance may seem a solution but if we really want to counter these biases, the principle of tolerance becomes so general that it loses any distinctive meaning. Therefore, we should accept the limited scope of tolerance and its biases. The principle of tolerance can still be useful for some problems where there is a clear and direct link to political or religious beliefs. Moreover, it should be cherished as a more general attitude or practice in Dutch society. For most problems of multiculturalism, however, we should appeal to broader theoretical frameworks that do justice to persons and practices.
|Keywords||Philosophy Ethics Ontology Political Philosophy|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Joseph Raz (1986). The Morality of Freedom. Oxford University Press.
Avishai Margalit (1998). [Book Review] the Decent Society. [REVIEW] Social Theory and Practice 24 (3):449-469.
Ross Harrison & Jeremy Waldron (1996). Liberal Rights. Philosophical Quarterly 46 (184):401.
Axel Honneth (1994). Kampf um Anerkennung. Zur moralischen Grammatik sozialer Konflikte. Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 56 (3):603-604.
Anna Elisabetta Galeotti (1993). Citizenship and Equality: The Place for Toleration. Political Theory 21 (4):585-605.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Yanguang Wang (2000). A Strategy of Clinical Tolerance for the Prevention of Hiv and Aids in China. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 25 (1):48 – 61.
C. S. Momoh (ed.) (1988). Nigerian Studies in Religious Tolerance. National Association for Religious Tolerance.
Matthew C. Haug (2014). On the Prospects for Ontology: Deflationism, Pluralism, and Carnap's Principle of Tolerance. European Journal of Philosophy 22 (4):593-616.
Andrew Fiala (2003). Stoic Tolerance. Res Publica 9 (2):149-168.
Robert Paul Wolff (1969). A Critique of Pure Tolerance. Boston, Beacon Press.
Lasse Thomassen (2006). The Inclusion of the Other? Habermas and the Paradox of Tolerance. Political Theory 34 (4):439 - 462.
Daniel Augenstein (2010). Tolerance and Liberal Justice. Ratio Juris 23 (4):437-459.
Ruth Macklin (1998). Ethical Relativism in a Multicultural Society. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 8 (1):1-22.
James J. Delaney & Jeffrey Dueck (2003). A Rethinking of Contemporary Religious Tolerance. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 77:73-82.
Wibren Van Der Burg (1998). Beliefs, Persons and Practices: Beyond Tolerance. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 1 (2):227 - 254.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads24 ( #155,530 of 1,793,093 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #344,170 of 1,793,093 )
How can I increase my downloads?