Graduate studies at Western
Philosophy and Social Criticism 27 (6):55-79 (2001)
|Abstract||As a response to the common criticism that phenomenology is handicapped by its descriptive faith, this article outlines a program for showing what a rational justification can be from a phenomenological perspective. The phenomenological position defended here stands between Rorty's thesis of objectivity in solidarity and Habermas's view of rationality through universal claims. In the first part of the article, I show how a justification of a stance, an action, or a behavior can only make appeal to standards and criteria which derive from a culture; in the second part, I argue that, since justification involves the making of claims, a claim makes both its author and its community accountable and liable for what is claimed; the third part shows how the encounter between cultures and communities exerts a greater scrutiny on claims made in one culture or community, thereby leading to progress in the justification process. Key Words: deconstruction justification phenomenology relativism validity claims.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Gregor Betz (2012). On Degrees of Justification. Erkenntnis 77 (2):237-272.
Jonathan L. Kvanvig & Christopher Menzel (1990). The Basic Notion of Justification. Philosophical Studies 59 (3):235-261.
Richard Swinburne (2001). Epistemic Justification. Oxford University Press.
John Turri (2010). On the Relationship Between Propositional and Doxastic Justification. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 80 (2):312-326.
Carlos Sanchez (2010). Epistemic Justification and Husserl's Phenomenology of Reason in Ideas I. In Pol Vandevelde & Sebastian Luft (eds.), Epistemology, Archaeology, Ethics: Current Investigations of Husserl's Corpus. Continuum.
Declan Smithies (2012). Moore's Paradox and the Accessibility of Justification. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 85 (2):273-300.
Mark Okrent (1993). The Truth, the Whole Truth, and Nothing but the Truth. Inquiry 36 (4):381 – 404.
Kent Reames (1999). Metaphysics, History, and Rational Justification: A Maclntyrean Response to Franklin Gamwell's Critique. Journal of Religious Ethics 27 (2):257 - 281.
Jane Duran (1994). Justification à la Mode and Justification Simpliciter. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 24 (2):178-191.
Harold Langsam (2008). Rationality, Justification, and the Internalism/Externalism Debate. Erkenntnis 68 (1):79 - 101.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads9 ( #122,562 of 738,687 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,778 of 738,687 )
How can I increase my downloads?