David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophy and Social Criticism 27 (6):55-79 (2001)
As a response to the common criticism that phenomenology is handicapped by its descriptive faith, this article outlines a program for showing what a rational justification can be from a phenomenological perspective. The phenomenological position defended here stands between Rorty's thesis of objectivity in solidarity and Habermas's view of rationality through universal claims. In the first part of the article, I show how a justification of a stance, an action, or a behavior can only make appeal to standards and criteria which derive from a culture; in the second part, I argue that, since justification involves the making of claims, a claim makes both its author and its community accountable and liable for what is claimed; the third part shows how the encounter between cultures and communities exerts a greater scrutiny on claims made in one culture or community, thereby leading to progress in the justification process. Key Words: deconstruction justification phenomenology relativism validity claims.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Gregor Betz (2012). On Degrees of Justification. Erkenntnis 77 (2):237-272.
Jane Duran (1994). Justification À la Mode and Justification Simpliciter. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 24 (2):178-191.
Kent Reames (1999). Metaphysics, History, and Rational Justification: A Maclntyrean Response to Franklin Gamwell's Critique. Journal of Religious Ethics 27 (2):257 - 281.
Mark Okrent (1993). The Truth, the Whole Truth, and Nothing but the Truth. Inquiry 36 (4):381 – 404.
Declan Smithies (2012). Moore's Paradox and the Accessibility of Justification. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 85 (2):273-300.
Carlos Sanchez (2010). Epistemic Justification and Husserl's Phenomenology of Reason in Ideas I. In Pol Vandevelde & Sebastian Luft (eds.), Epistemology, Archaeology, Ethics: Current Investigations of Husserl's Corpus. Continuum
John Turri (2010). On the Relationship Between Propositional and Doxastic Justification. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 80 (2):312-326.
Richard Swinburne (2001). Epistemic Justification. Oxford University Press.
Jonathan L. Kvanvig & Christopher Menzel (1990). The Basic Notion of Justification. Philosophical Studies 59 (3):235-261.
Harold Langsam (2008). Rationality, Justification, and the Internalism/Externalism Debate. Erkenntnis 68 (1):79 - 101.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads11 ( #212,899 of 1,724,951 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #349,164 of 1,724,951 )
How can I increase my downloads?