Deterrence and the death penalty: A rejoinder
Ethics 81 (1):74-75 (1970)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,709 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesMaimon Schwarzschild (2002). Retribution, Deterrence, and the Death Penalty: A Response to Hugo Bedau. Criminal Justice Ethics 21 (2):9-11.
David Detmer (2005). DNA, Deterrence, and the Death Penalty. Journal of Philosophical Research 30:391-396.
Jeffrey Reiman (1990). The Death Penalty, Deterrence, and Horribleness. Social Theory and Practice 16 (2):261-272.
Ernest van den Haag (2009). In Defense of the Death Penalty. In Steven M. Cahn (ed.), Exploring Ethics: An Introductory Anthology. Oxford University Press.
Ernest Den Haavang (1968). On Deterrence and the Death Penalty. Ethics 78 (4):280-.
Ernest Van Den Haag (1968). On Deterrence and the Death Penalty. Ethics 78 (4):280 - 288.
Ernest Van Den Haag (1968). On Deterrence and the Death Penalty. Ethics 78 (4):280-288.
Ernest van Den Haag (1970). Deterrence and the Death Penalty: A Rejoinder. Ethics 81 (1):74 - 75.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads191 ( #1,455 of 549,754 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,425 of 549,754 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
