How Is Education Possible? Pragmatism, Communication and the Social Organisation of Education

British Journal of Educational Studies 54 (2):160 - 174 (2006)
Education cannot mean that the young are the product of the activities of their teachers. At the same time, we do not speak of education if students would simply learn something irrespective of the activities of their teachers. In this paper we focus on the question: How is education possible? Our aim is to contribute to a social theory of education, a theory that does not reduce our understanding of educational processes and practices to underlying 'constituting elements' but rather tries to understand the social nature of education as a reality sui generis.
Keywords Kant  pragmatism  Dewey  schooling  communication
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.2307/3699254
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 15,865
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Raf Vanderstraeten (2002). Dewey's Transactional Constructivism. Journal of Philosophy of Education 36 (2):233–246.

View all 6 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Jim Shelton (2010). The Subversive Nature of Liberal Education. Philosophy in the Contemporary World 17 (2):25-29.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

22 ( #130,340 of 1,724,928 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

5 ( #134,554 of 1,724,928 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.