"Heads I win, tails you lose": A foray into the psychology of philosophy
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
One of the classic papers of Australian feminist philosophy is G. Lloyd's "The Man of Reason" (Lloyd, 1979). The main concern of this paper is the alleged maleness of the Man of Reason, i.e., the thesis that our philosophical tradition in some deep way associates the concepts rational and male. Lloyd claims that her main goal is to bring this "undoubted" thesis "into clearer focus" (p.18), and indeed she makes no strenuous effort to demonstrate that the to-be-clarified thesis is actually true. There are however a few places where she advances material she seems to be taking as some kind of evidence that the Man of Reason is male. One is on the second page, where she quotes from Augustine: And finally we see man, made in your image and likeness, ruling over all the irrational animals for the very reason that he was made in your image and resembles you, that is because he has the power of reason and understanding. And just as in man's soul there are two forces; on which is dominant because it deliberates and one which obeys because it is subject to such guidance, in the same way in the physical sense, woman has been made for man. In her mind and her rational intelligence she has a nature the equal of man's, but in sex she is physically subject to him in the same way as our natural impulses need to be subjected to the reasoning power of the mind, in order that the actions to which they lead may be inspired by the principles of good conduct. Now an interesting feature of this passage is that it appears to directly contradict the thesis of the maleness of the Man of Reason. Far from saying that rationality is a male prerogative, Augustine claims that "in her mind and her rational intelligence she has a nature the equal of man's" (my emphasis). Certainly Augustine claims that in sex woman is subject to man, and he also claims that there is an analogy or parallel between the dominance of man over woman in sex and the dominance of the rational part of the mind over the natural impulses..
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library||
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Hasana Sharp (2011). Spinoza and the Politics of Renaturalization. The University of Chicago Press.
Fay Edwards, Porphyry's Rational Animals: Why Barnes' Appeal to Non-Specific Predication is a Non-Starter.
Paul Nash (1980). The Educated Man: Studies in the History of Educational Thought. R. E. Krieger Pub. Co..
John Herlihy (2004). Near and Distant Horizons: In Search of the Primary Sources of Knowledge. Sophia Perennis.
Paul Nash (1965). The Educated Man. New York, Wiley.
James Edward Nicholson (1943). Anthropos; or, the Problem of Man. London, Watts & Co..
Raia Prokhovnik (2002). Rational Woman: A Feminist Critique of Dichotomy. Distributed Exclusively in the Usa by Palgrave.
Genevieve Lloyd (1993). The Man of Reason: "Male" and "Female" in Western Philosophy. University of Minnesota Press.
Added to index2009-07-27
Total downloads15 ( #119,726 of 1,413,337 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?