David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Techne 14 (3):207-225 (2010)
In this article, I will investigate the ways in which Ambient Intelligence, the technological paradigm of the near future proposed by the European Union and the electronics multinational Philips, will affect the ways in which individuals construct and express their identities. The Ambient Intelligence vision predicts a world in which technologies will deliver personalized services in a proactive (rather than a responsive or interactive) fashion. I argue that this brings about a change in the way we interact with these technologies, which in turn has an effect on the way we construct and express identities in relation to such technologies. In a world of Ambient Intelligence, I will argue in this article, technological artifacts may come to function as ‘reference collectivities’, comparable to human reference groups. Due to their proactivity, their level of autonomy and self-reliance and our personalized interactions with them, these technologies will come to function as ‘others’, rather than as ‘quasi-others’
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Peter-Paul Verbeek (2009). Ambient Intelligence and Persuasive Technology: The Blurring Boundaries Between Human and Technology. [REVIEW] NanoEthics 3 (3):231-242.
Eleni Kosta, Olli Pitkänen, Marketta Niemelä & Eija Kaasinen (2010). Mobile-Centric Ambient Intelligence in Health- and Homecare—Anticipating Ethical and Legal Challenges. Science and Engineering Ethics 16 (2):303-323.
Philip Brey (2005). Freedom and Privacy in Ambient Intelligence. Ethics and Information Technology 7 (3):157-166.
Mireille Hildebrandt (2008). Ambient Intelligence, Criminal Liability and Democracy. Criminal Law and Philosophy 2 (2):163-180.
Asle H. Kiran & Peter-Paul Verbeek (2010). Trusting Our Selves to Technology. Knowledge, Technology and Policy 23 (3-4):409-427.
Katja de Vries (2010). Identity, Profiling Algorithms and a World of Ambient Intelligence. Ethics and Information Technology 12 (1):71-85.
Niels van Dijk (2010). Property, Privacy and Personhood in a World of Ambient Intelligence. Ethics and Information Technology 12 (1):57-69.
Simone van der Burg (2009). Imagining the Future of Photoacoustic Mammography. Science and Engineering Ethics 15 (1):97-110.
Astrid Schülke, Herbert Plischke & Niko Kohls (2010). Ambient Assistive Technologies (AAT): Socio-Technology as a Powerful Tool for Facing the Inevitable Sociodemographic Challenges? Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine 5 (1):1-6.
María G. Navarro (2011). Collective Challenges for the Realisation of a Collective Intelligence. Analytic Teaching and Philosophical Praxis 32 (1):40-47.
Stuart Nolan (2003). Box Clever: The Intelligence of Television. [REVIEW] AI and Society 17 (1):25-36.
Eric Steinhart (2008). Teilhard de Chardin and Transhumanism. Journal of Evolution and Technology 20 (1):1-22.
Philippe Verdoux (2011). Emerging Technologies and the Future of Philosophy. Metaphilosophy 42 (5):682-707.
Bjørn Hofmann, Jan Helge Solbakk & Søren Holm (2006). Teaching Old Dogs New Tricks: The Role of Analogies in Bioethical Analysis and Argumentation Concerning New Technologies. [REVIEW] Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 27 (5):397-413.
Added to index2011-01-09
Total downloads9 ( #378,845 of 1,934,509 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #434,193 of 1,934,509 )
How can I increase my downloads?