Modal epistemology

Philosophical Studies 92 (1):67--84 (1998)
Many important metaphysical arguments validly deduce an actuality from a possibility. For example: Because it is possible for me to exist in the absence of anything material, I am not my body. I argue that there is no reason to suppose that our capacity for modal judgment is equal to the task of determining whether the "possibility" premise of any of these arguments is true. I connect this thesis with Stephen Yablo's recent work on the epistemology of modal statements.
Keywords A Priori, Epistemology, Knowledge, Modal, Possibility
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1023/A:1017159501073
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 23,305
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Thomas Atkinson (2016). Conceivability, Possibility and the Resurrection of Material Beings. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 80 (2):115-132.
Peter Hawke (2011). Van Inwagen's Modal Skepticism. Philosophical Studies 153 (3):351-364.

View all 26 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

133 ( #31,949 of 1,932,595 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

21 ( #27,541 of 1,932,595 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.