Argumentation 24 (4):475-487 (2010)
|Abstract||An argumentative text can be reconstructed as an argumentative discussion between a protagonist and an antagonist. However, such a text is usually not a literal report of a discussion. It is the author of the text who determines how issues are presented, how claims are modeled, how the development of the discussion is presented. Especially when a text has embedded discourse voices that can fulfill the roles of protagonist or antagonist, the author of the text can strongly suggest a specific assignment, suppressing alternatives. In this article examples are presented that show how an author exploits linguistic means—a strategic choice of causal connectives—to suggest a specific reconstruction. The question is raised whether a derailment of this behavior of the author should be characterized as committing the fallacy of the straw man.|
|Keywords||Dialectical discussion Protagonist Causality Subjectivity Rhetorical strategy|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Frans H. van Eemeren & Rob Grootendorst (2003). A Pragma-Dialectical Procedure for a Critical Discussion. Argumentation 17 (4):365-386.
Andreas Stokke (2013). Protagonist Projection. Mind and Language 28 (2):204-232.
Marina Grishakova (2000). V. Nabokovi "Bend Sinister". Sign Systems Studies 28:263-263.
Gordon Mitchell (2010). Higher-Order Strategic Maneuvering in Argumentation. Argumentation 24 (3):319-335.
Hans Sluga (1985). Foucault, the Author, and the Discourse. Inquiry 28 (1-4):403 – 415.
Michael Bamberg & Nancy Budwig (1992). Therapeutic Misconceptions: When the Voices of Caring and Research Are Misconstrued as the Voice of Curing. Ethics and Behavior 2 (3):165 – 184.
Frans van Eemeren (2011). In Context. Argumentation 25 (2):141-161.
Merold Westphal (2001). On Reading God the Author. Religious Studies 37 (3):271-291.
Frans H. van Eemeren & Peter Houtlosser (2003). The Development of the Pragma-Dialectical Approach to Argumentation. Argumentation 17 (4):387-403.
Paul van den Hoven (2011). Marcin Lewinski: Internet Political Discussion Forums as an Argumentative Activity Type. A Pragma-Dialectical Analysis of Online Forms of Strategic Manoeuvring in Reacting Critically. Argumentation 25 (2):255-259.
Frans H. van Eemeren, Bart Garssen & Bert Meuffels (2012). The Disguised Abusive Ad Hominem Empirically Investigated: Strategic Manoeuvring with Direct Personal Attacks. Thinking and Reasoning 18 (3):344 - 364.
David Hitchcock (2002). The Practice of Argumentative Discussion. Argumentation 16 (3):287-298.
Marcin Lewiński (2011). Towards a Critique-Friendly Approach to the Straw Man Fallacy Evaluation. Argumentation 25 (4):469-497.
Marcin LewiÅ„Ski (2011). Towards a Critique-Friendly Approach to the Straw Man Fallacy Evaluation. Argumentation 25 (4):469-497.
Added to index2011-05-11
Total downloads3 ( #213,250 of 722,781 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,541 of 722,781 )
How can I increase my downloads?