On the epistemological foundations of the law of the lever

Abstract In this paper I challenge Paolo Palmieri’s reading of the Mach-Vailati debate on Archimedes’s proof of the law of the lever. I argue that the actual import of the debate concerns the possible epistemic (as opposed to merely pragmatic) role of mathematical arguments in empirical physics, and that construed in this light Vailati carries the upper hand. This claim is defended by showing that Archimedes’s proof of the law of the lever is not a way of appealing to a non-empirical source of information, but a way of explicating the mathematical structure that can represent the empirical information at our disposal in the most general way.
Keywords Law of the lever  Mach  Archimedes
Categories
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive
External links
  •   Try with proxy.
  • Through your library Configure

    Similar books and articles
    Paolo Palmieri (2008). The Empirical Basis of Equilibrium: Mach, Vailati, and the Lever. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 39 (1):42-53.
    George Goe (1972). Archimedes' Theory of the Lever and Mach's Critique. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 2 (4):329-345.
    Manuel Bächtold (forthcoming). Saving Mach's View on Atoms. Journal for General Philosophy of Science.
    J. Lever (1970). Where Are We Headed? Grand Rapids, Mich.,W. B. Eerdmans.

    Analytics

    Monthly downloads

    Added to index

    2010-09-02

    Total downloads

    30 ( #40,899 of 549,550 )

    Recent downloads (6 months)

    21 ( #2,672 of 549,550 )

    How can I increase my downloads?


    My notes
    Sign in to use this feature


    Discussion
    Start a new thread
    Order:
    There  are no threads in this forum
    Nothing in this forum yet.

    Other forums