Pragma-Dialectical Analysis and Evaluation of Problem-Solving Discussion
Argumentation 17 (4):465-479 (2003)
| Abstract | In this article, after arguing that present approaches to improving problem-solving discussions for various reasons are not satisfactory, I turn to the pragma-dialectic approach to argumentative discourse to derive a normative framework that can serve as a point of departure to enhance the quality of problem-solving discussions. I then show how this approach can be used as analytical and evaluative instrument that can help the analyst to establish whether participants in actual practice act in a fashion that is in accord with the norms posited. Two real-life problem-solving discussions provide the material for this demonstration | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | No categories specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,679 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesM. A. van Rees (2001). The Diagnostic Power of the Stages of Critical Discussion in the Analysis and Evaluation of Problem-Solving Discussions. Argumentation 15 (4):457-470.
Frans H. Eemeren (2012). The Pragma-Dialectical Theory Under Discussion. Argumentation 26 (4):439-457.
Eveline T. Feteris (2000). A Dialogical Theory of Legal Discussions:Pragma-Dialectical Analysis and Evaluation of Legalargumentation. Artificial Intelligence and Law 8 (2-3).
Frans H. van Eemeren & Peter Houtlosser (2003). The Development of the Pragma-Dialectical Approach to Argumentation. Argumentation 17 (4):387-403.
Frans van Eemeren, Bart Garssen & Bert Meuffels (2012). Effectiveness Through Reasonableness Preliminary Steps to Pragma-Dialectical Effectiveness Research. Argumentation 26 (1):33-53.
Frans H. Eemeren, Bart Garssen & Bert Meuffels (2012). Effectiveness Through Reasonableness Preliminary Steps to Pragma-Dialectical Effectiveness Research. Argumentation 26 (1):33-53.
David Braybrooke (2003). Toward an Alliance Between the Issue-Processing Approach and Pragma-Dialectical Analysis. Argumentation 17 (4):513-535.
Lisa M. Osbeck & Nancy J. Nersessian (forthcoming). Affective Problem Solving: Emotion in Research Practice. Mind and Society.
Dongming Xu (forthcoming). Beyond Simon 's Means-Ends Analysis: Natural Creativity and the Unanswered 'Why' in the Design of Intelligent Systems for Problem-Solving. Minds and Machines.
Frans H. van Eemeren & Peter Houtlosser (2000). Rhetorical Analysis Within a Pragma-Dialectical Framework. Argumentation 14 (3):293-305.
Eveline T. Feteris (2002). A Pragma-Dialectical Approach of the Analysis and Evaluation of Pragmatic Argumentation in a Legal Context. Argumentation 16 (3):349-367.
Alvin I. Goldman (1983). Epistemology and the Theory of Problem Solving. Synthese 55 (1):21 - 48.
Daniel Bonevac (2003). Pragma-Dialectics and Beyond. Argumentation 17 (4):451-459.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2010-09-11Total downloads13 ( #87,931 of 549,087 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,317 of 549,087 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
