David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Acta Biotheoretica 53 (2):57-75 (2005)
This paper analyses the actual meaning of a transcendental philosophy of biology, and does so by exploring and actualising the epistemological and metaphysical value of Kant's viewpoint on living systems. It finds inspiration in the Kantian idea of living systems intrinsically resisting objectification, but critically departs from Kant's philosophical solution in as far as it is based in a subjectivist dogmatism. It attempts to overcome this dogmatism, on the one hand by explicitly taking into account the conditions of possibility at the side of the subject, and on the other hand by embedding both the living and the knowing system into an ontology of complexly organized dynamical systems. This paper fits into the transcendental perspective in acknowledging the need to analyse the conditions of knowability, prior to the contents of what is known. But it also contributes to an expansion and an actualisation of the issue of transcendentality itself by considering the conditions of possibility at the side of the object as intrinsically linked to the conditions of possibility at the side of the subject.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
W. D. Christensen & C. A. Hooker (2000). An Interactivist-Constructivist Approach to Intelligence: Self-Directed Anticipative Learning. Philosophical Psychology 13 (1):5 – 45.
John Collier & Cliff Hooker (1999). Complexly Organised Dynamical Systems. Open Systems and Information Dynamics 6 (3):241–302.
David L. Hull (2000). The Professionalization of Science Studies: Cutting Some Slack. [REVIEW] Biology and Philosophy 15 (1):61-91.
Michel Bitbol (1998). Some Steps Towards a Transcendental Deduction of Quantum Mechanics. Philosophia Naturalis 35:253-280.
David L. Hull (2002). Recent Philosophy of Biology: A Review. Acta Biotheoretica 50 (2):117-128.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Philippe De Backer, Danny De Waele & Linda Van Speybroeck (2010). Ins and Outs of Systems Biology Vis-À-Vis Molecular Biology: Continuation or Clear Cut? Acta Biotheoretica 58 (1):15-49.
Manuel Bremer (2008). Transcendental Logic Redefined. Review of Contemporary Philosophy 7.
Béatrice Han (2002). Foucault's Critical Project: Between the Transcendental and the Historical. Stanford University Press.
Oskari Kuusela (2008). Transcendental Arguments and the Problem of Dogmatism. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 16 (1):57 – 75.
Kenneth R. Westphal (2004). Kant's Transcendental Proof of Realism. Cambridge University Press.
Daniel Dahlstrom (2005). Heidegger's Transcendentalism. Research in Phenomenology 35 (1):29-54.
Avery Goldman (2002). The Metaphysics of Kantian Epistemology. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 76:239-252.
Gertrudis Van de Vijver, Linda Van Speybroeck & Windy Vandevyvere (2003). Reflecting on Complexity of Biological Systems: Kant and Beyond? Acta Biotheoretica 51 (2):101-140.
Mark Pickering (2011). The Systematic Unity of Nature as a Transcendental Illusion. Kantian Review 16 (3):429-448.
Filip Kolen & Gertrudis Van de Vijver (2007). Philosophy of Biology: Naturalistic or Transcendental? Acta Biotheoretica 55 (1):35-46.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads18 ( #213,831 of 1,911,814 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #255,606 of 1,911,814 )
How can I increase my downloads?