David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Ethics and Information Technology 12 (1):57-69 (2010)
Profiling technologies are the facilitating force behind the vision of Ambient Intelligence in which everyday devices are connected and embedded with all kinds of smart characteristics enabling them to take decisions in order to serve our preferences without us being aware of it. These technological practices have considerable impact on the process by which our personhood takes shape and pose threats like discrimination and normalisation. The legal response to these developments should move away from a focus on entitlements to personal data, towards making transparent and controlling the profiling process by which knowledge is produced from these data. The tendency in intellectual property law to commodify information embedded in software and profiles could counteract this shift to transparency and control. These rights obstruct the access and contestation of the design of the code that impacts one’s personhood. This triggers a political discussion about the public nature of this code and forces us to rethink the relations between property, privacy and personhood in the digital age.
|Keywords||Ambient intelligence Data protection Personhood Intellectual property Privacy Profiling Property Transparency Transparency enhancing technologies Ubiquitous computing|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Michel Foucault (1977). Discipline and Punish. Vintage Books.
Edwin C. Hettinger (1989). Justifying Intellectual Property. Philosophy and Public Affairs 18 (1):31-52.
John Locke (1690/1970). An Essay Concerning Human Understanding, 1690. Menston,Scolar Press.
John Locke (1988). Two Treatises of Government. Cambridge University Press.
Citations of this work BETA
Rachel Batchelor, Ania Bobrowicz, Robin Mackenzie & Alisoun Milne (2012). Challenges of Ethical and Legal Responsibilities When Technologies' Uses and Users Change: Social Networking Sites, Decision-Making Capacity and Dementia. [REVIEW] Ethics and Information Technology 14 (2):99-108.
Similar books and articles
William S. Brown (1996). Technology, Workplace Privacy and Personhood. Journal of Business Ethics 15 (11):1237 - 1248.
Lars Oystein Ursin (2010). Privacy and Property in the Biobank Context. HEC Forum 22 (3):211-224.
Frances S. Grodzinsky & Herman T. Tavani (2005). P2p Networks and the Verizon V. RIAA Case: Implications for Personal Privacy and Intellectual Property. [REVIEW] Ethics and Information Technology 7 (4):243-250.
Tom L. Beauchamp (1999). The Failure of Theories of Personhood. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 9 (4):309-324.
Antoinette Rouvroy (2008). Privacy, Data Protection, and the Unprecedented Challenges of Ambient Intelligence. Studies in Ethics, Law, and Technology 2 (1).
Peter-Paul Verbeek (2009). Ambient Intelligence and Persuasive Technology: The Blurring Boundaries Between Human and Technology. [REVIEW] NanoEthics 3 (3):231-242.
Bibi van Den Berg (2010). I-Object. Techne 14 (3):207-225.
Katja de Vries (2010). Identity, Profiling Algorithms and a World of Ambient Intelligence. Ethics and Information Technology 12 (1):71-85.
Eleni Kosta, Olli Pitkänen, Marketta Niemelä & Eija Kaasinen (2010). Mobile-Centric Ambient Intelligence in Health- and Homecare—Anticipating Ethical and Legal Challenges. Science and Engineering Ethics 16 (2):303-323.
Philip Brey (2005). Freedom and Privacy in Ambient Intelligence. Ethics and Information Technology 7 (3):157-166.
Added to index2009-11-07
Total downloads31 ( #56,288 of 1,101,656 )
Recent downloads (6 months)6 ( #44,817 of 1,101,656 )
How can I increase my downloads?