Linguistics and Philosophy 26 (6):727-763 (2003)
|Abstract||Why do we ask questions? Because we want tohave some information. But why this particular kind ofinformation? Because only information of this particularkind is helpful to resolve the decision problemthat the agent faces. In this paper I argue thatquestions are asked because their answers help toresolve the questioner's decision problem, and that thisassumption helps us to interpret interrogativesentences. Interrogative sentences are claimed to have asemantically underspecified meaning and thisunderspecification is resolved by means of the decisionproblem.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Michael J. Shaffer (2009). Decision Theory, Intelligent Planning and Counterfactuals. Minds and Machines 19 (1):61-92.
Michele Piccione & Ariel Rubinstein, On the Interpretation of Decision Problems with Imperfect Recall.
John Maule & Gaëlle Villejoubert (2007). What Lies Beneath: Reframing Framing Effects. Thinking and Reasoning 13 (1):25 – 44.
Reed Richter (1985). Rationality, Group Choice and Expected Utility. Synthese 63 (2):203 - 232.
Enrica Carbone & John D. Hey (2001). A Test of the Principle of Optimality. Theory and Decision 50 (3):263-281.
Olivier Roy (2009). Intentions and Interactive Transformations of Decision Problems. Synthese 169 (2):335 - 349.
M. R. Yilmaz (1997). In Defense of a Constructive, Information-Based Approach to Decision Theory. Theory and Decision 43 (1):21-44.
Robert Van Rooy (2003). Questioning to Resolve Decision Problems. Linguistics and Philosophy 26 (6):727 - 763.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads7 ( #133,587 of 549,591 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,397 of 549,591 )
How can I increase my downloads?