David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Human Rights Quarterly 28 (2):438-464 (2006)
The practice of screening potential users of reproductive services is of profound social and political significance. Access screening is inconsistent with the principles of equality and self-determination, and violates individual and group human rights. Communities that strive to function in accord with those principles should not permit access screening, even screening that purports to be a benign exercise of professional discretion. Because reproductive choice is controversial, regulation by law may be required in most jurisdictions to provide effective protection for reproductive rights. In Canada, for example, equal access can, and should be, guaranteed by federal regulations imposing strict conditions on the licences of fertility clinics.
|Keywords||human rights screening access reproductive technology discrimination bio-medical ethics professional ethics professional accountability regulation of medical profession reproductive rights|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Samuel Gorovitz (1985). Engineering Human Reproduction: A Challenge to Public Policy. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 10 (3):267-274.
John R. Spencer & Antje Du Bois-Pedain (eds.) (2006). Freedom and Responsibility in Reproductive Choice. Hart Pub..
Sahin Aksoy (2001). Antenatal Screening and its Possible Meaning From Unborn Baby's Perspective. BMC Medical Ethics 2 (1):1-11.
S. G. Nicholls (2010). Knowledge or Understanding? Informed Choice in the Context of Newborn Bloodspot Screening. Public Health Ethics 3 (2):128-136.
Virginia A. Moyer Ned Calonge Steven M. Teutsch Jeffrey R. Botkin (2008). Expanding Newborn Screening: Process, Policy, and Priorities. Hastings Center Report 38 (3):pp. 32-39.
Elise Smith, Jason Behrmann, Carolina Martin & Bryn Williams-jones (2010). Reproductive Tourism in Argentina: Clinic Accreditation and its Implications for Consumers, Health Professionals and Policy Makers. Developing World Bioethics 10 (2):59-69.
Susan L. Crockin (2010). Legal Conceptions: The Evolving Law and Policy of Assisted Reproductive Technologies. Johns Hopkins University Press.
Victoria Seavilleklein (2009). Challenging the Rhetoric of Choice in Prenatal Screening. Bioethics 23 (1):68-77.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads6 ( #160,134 of 1,004,679 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #64,743 of 1,004,679 )
How can I increase my downloads?