David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Canadian Bar Review 84 (1):89-105 (2005)
Despite amendments to the sexual assault provisions in the Criminal Code, decisions about the availability and operation of the defence of belief in consent remain vulnerable to the influence of legally extraneous considerations. The author proposes an approach designed to limit the influence of such considerations
|Keywords||defence of belief in consent sexual assault criminal law Canada|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
R. M. (2004). Understanding Acts of Consent: Using Speech Act Theory to Help Resolve Moral Dilemmas and Legal Disputes. Law and Philosophy 23 (5):495-525.
Lucinda Vandervort (2005). The Defence of Belief in Consent: Guidelines and Jury Instructions for Application of Criminal Code Section 265(4). Criminal Law Quarterly 50 (4):441-452.
Mary E. Carr & Alda L. Moettus (2010). Developing a Policy for Sexual Assault Examinations on Incapacitated Patients and Patients Unable to Consent. Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 38 (3):647-653.
David Archard (2007). Is It Rape? On Acquaintance Rape and Taking Women's Consent Seriously - by Joan McGregor, Making Sense of Sexual Consent - by Mark Cowling & Paul Reynolds, the Logic of Consent, the Diversity and Deceptiveness of Consent as a Defence to Criminal Conduct - by Peter Westen, and Consent to Sexual Relations - by Lan Wertheimer. Journal of Applied Philosophy 24 (2):209–221.
Sarah Deer, Sovereignty of the Soul: Exploring the Intersection of Rape Law Reform and Federal Indian Law.
P. Markwick (2002). Harming Consent. Res Publica 8 (2):157-162.
Lisa Sarmas, Mixed Messages on Sexual Assault and the Statute of Limitations: Stingel V. Clark, the Ipp 'Reforms' and an Argument for Change.
Rosemarie Putnam Tong (1999). David Archard, Sexual Consent:Sexual Consent. Ethics 109 (3):643-644.
Lucinda Vandervort (2004). Honest Beliefs, Credible Lies, and Culpable Awareness: Rhetoric, Inequality, and Mens Rea in Sexual Assault. Osgoode Hall Law Journal 42 (4):625-660.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads20 ( #176,478 of 1,789,791 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #313,929 of 1,789,791 )
How can I increase my downloads?