Sexuate difference, ontological difference: Between Irigaray and Heidegger
Continental Philosophy Review 43 (1):111-126 (2010)
| Abstract | Animating Luce Irigaray’s oeuvre are two indissociable projects: the disruption of Western metaphysics and the thinking of sexual difference. The intersection of these two projects implies that any attempt to think through the meaning and significance of Irigaray’s notoriously fraught invocation of sexual difference must take seriously the way in which this invocation is itself always already inflected by her disruptive gesture. In this paper, I will attempt to elucidate one moment of this intersection by focusing on her critical engagement with Heidegger. In L’oubli de l’air , Irigaray criticizes Heidegger’s interpretation of the principle of identity as instantiating the same neglect of sexual difference that has been inscribed throughout the history of Western metaphysics. Moreover, Irigaray identifies the vestigial traces of this metaphysical legacy in Heidegger’s commitments to phenomenology. My claim, however, is that if we turn to Derrida’s second Geschlecht essay in order to mediate between Irigaray and Heidegger, the coimplicative nature of their projects comes into focus: on one hand, Derrida identifies within Heidegger’s work an incipient articulation of the very notion of sexuate difference that, on Irigaray’s reading, Heidegger’s work requires but nonetheless elides; on the other hand, Derrida’s rereading of Heidegger’s phenomenological commitments corroborates the philosophical significance of Irigaray’s intervention by recontextualizing the parameters that delimit her invocation of sexuate difference. | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,672 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesKate Ince (1996). Questions to Luce Irigaray. Hypatia 11 (2):122 - 140.
William Robert (2010). Antigone's Nature. Hypatia 25 (2):412-436.
Luce Irigaray (1999). The Forgetting of Air in Martin Heidegger. University of Texas Press.
Alison Stone (2006). Luce Irigaray and the Philosophy of Sexual Difference. Cambridge University Press.
Alison Stone (2003). Irigaray and Hölderlin on the Relation Between Nature and Culture. Continental Philosophy Review 36 (4):415-432.
Anne Caldwell (2002). Transforming Sacrifice: Irigaray and the Politics of Sexual Difference. Hypatia 17 (4):16-39.
Penelope Deutscher (2002). A Politics of Impossible Difference: The Later Work of Luce Irigaray. Cornell University Press.
Helen Fielding (2003). Questioning Nature: Irigaray, Heidegger and the Potentiality of Matter. Continental Philosophy Review 36 (1):1-26.
Krzysztof Ziarek (2000). Proximities: Irigaray and Heidegger on Difference. Continental Philosophy Review 33 (2):133-158.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2010-04-17Total downloads33 ( #36,535 of 549,068 )Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #37,252 of 549,068 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
