Topics in Cognitive Science 4 (1):63-71 (2012)
|Abstract||Four articles in this issue of topiCS (volume 4, issue 1) argue against a computational approach in cognitive science in favor of a dynamical approach. I concur that the computational approach faces some considerable explanatory challenges. Yet the dynamicists’ proposal that cognition is self-organized seems to only go so far in addressing these challenges. Take, for instance, the hypothesis that cognitive behavior emerges when brain and body (re-)configure to satisfy task and environmental constraints. It is known that for certain systems of constraints, no procedure can exist (whether modular, local, centralized, or self-organized) that reliably finds the right configuration in a realistic amount of time. Hence, the dynamical approach still faces the challenge of explaining how self-organized constraint satisfaction can be achieved by human brains and bodies in real time. In this commentary, I propose a methodology that dynamicists can use to try to address this challenge|
|Keywords||Constraint satisfaction Explanation Dynamical systems NP‐hard Modeling Intractable Self‐organization Complexity|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Daniel A. Weiskopf (2004). The Place of Time in Cognition. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 55 (1):87-105.
Keith Davids & Simon Bennett (1998). The Dynamical Hypothesis: The Role of Biological Constraints on Cognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (5):636-636.
Andrew Howes (2012). Useful Theories Make Predictions. Topics in Cognitive Science 4 (1):84-86.
Randall D. Beer (1998). Framing the Debate Between Computational and Dynamical Approaches to Cognitive Science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (5):630-630.
Matthew Botvinick (2012). Commentary: Why I Am Not a Dynamicist. Topics in Cognitive Science 4 (1):78-83.
Andy Clark (1998). Time and Mind. Journal of Philosophy 95 (7):354-76.
Keld Stehr Nielsen (2006). Dynamical Explanation in Cognitive Science. Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 37 (1):139 - 163.
Tim Smithers (1998). In Time and Over Time. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (5):651-652.
Tim van Gelder (1998). The Dynamical Hypothesis in Cognitive Science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (5):615-28.
D. Heinke (2000). A Dynamical System Theory Approach to Cognitive Neuroscience. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (4):543-543.
Andrew A. Fingelkurts, Alexander A. Fingelkurts & Carlos F. H. Neves (2010). Natural World Physical, Brain Operational, and Mind Phenomenal Space-Time. Physics of Life Reviews 7 (2):195-249.
Eric-Jan Wagenmakers, Han L. J. van der Maas & Simon Farrell (2012). Abstract Concepts Require Concrete Models: Why Cognitive Scientists Have Not Yet Embraced Nonlinearly Coupled, Dynamical, Self-Organized Critical, Synergistic, Scale-Free, Exquisitely Context-Sensitive, Interaction-Dominant, Multifractal, Interdependent Brain-Body-Niche Systems. Topics in Cognitive Science 4 (1):87-93.
Marcin Miłkowski (2012). Limits of Computational Explanation of Cognition. In Vincent Muller (ed.), Philosophy and Theory of Artificial Intelligence. Springer.
William Bechtel (1998). Dynamicists Versus Computationalists: Whither Mechanists? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (5):629-629.
Added to index2012-01-18
Total downloads30 ( #46,355 of 722,777 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,541 of 722,777 )
How can I increase my downloads?