The roles of one thought experiment in interpreting quantum mechanics. Werner Heisenberg meets Thomas Kuhn
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophica 72 (3):79-103 (2003)
Recent years saw the rise of an interest in the roles and significance of thought experiments in different areas of human thinking. Heisenberg's gamma ray microscope is no doubt one of the most famous examples of a thought experiment in physics. Nevertheless, this particular thought experiment has not received much detailed attention in the philosophical literature on thought experiments up to date, maybe because of its often claimed inadequacies. In this paper, I try to do two things: to provide an interesting interpretation of the roles played by Heisenberg's gamma ray microscope in interpreting quantum mechanics – partly based on Thomas Kuhn’s views on the function of thought experiments – and to contribute to the ongoing discussions on the roles and significance of thought experiments in physics.
|Keywords||Thought Experiments Uncertainty Principle Heisenberg microscope Quantum Mechanics|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Michael T. Stuart (2016). Taming Theory with Thought Experiments: Understanding and Scientific Progress. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 58:24-33.
Similar books and articles
Elke Brendel (2004). Intuition Pumps and the Proper Use of Thought Experiments. Dialectica 58 (1):89–108.
Kristian Camilleri (2007). Indeterminacy and the Limits of Classical Concepts: The Transformation of Heisenberg's Thought. Perspectives on Science 15 (2):178-201.
David Atkinson (2003). Experiments and Thought Experiments in Natural Science. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science 232:209-226.
Ana Butković (2007). What is the Function of Thought Experiments. Croatian Journal of Philosophy 7 (1):63-67.
Jeroen van Dongen (2007). The Interpretation of the Einstein-Rupp Experiments and Their Influence on the History of Quantum Mechanics. Historical Studies in the Physical and Biological Sciences 37:121-131.
Michael A. Bishop (1999). Why Thought Experiments Are Not Arguments. Philosophy of Science 66 (4):534-541.
Aspasia S. Moue, Kyriakos A. Masavetas & Haido Karayianni (2006). Tracing the Development of Thought Experiments in the Philosophy of Natural Sciences. Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 37 (1):61 - 75.
Andre M. Archie (2010). The Anatomy of Three Thought Experiments in Plato's Republic, Apology, and Alcibiades Minor. Journal of Philosophical Research 35:305-321.
Buzzoni Marco (2010). Empirical Thought Experiments: A Trascendental-Operational View. Epistemologia. An Italian Journal for the Philosophy of Science 33:05-26.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads260 ( #10,703 of 1,940,864 )
Recent downloads (6 months)70 ( #4,470 of 1,940,864 )
How can I increase my downloads?