The truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth: Robert grosseteste on universals (and the posterior analytics )
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of the History of Philosophy 48 (2):pp. 153-170 (2010)
The reintroduction of aristotle's Analytics to the Latin West—in particular, the reintroduction of the Posterior Analytics—forever altered the course of medieval epistemological discussions. 1 In the memorable words of Jonathan Barnes, "Aristotle's sweet Analytics ravished generations of European scholars and scientists. The Prior Analytics displayed the pure discipline of logic, well-formed, elegant, seductive; the Posterior Analytics beckoned to deeper mysteries, offering a sure path to scientific progress, clear and imperious in its injunctions, delicious in its rigor." 2 Although the Analytics fell decidedly from grace in later centuries, the sophisticated account of human cognition developed in the Posterior Analytics appealed so strongly to thirteenth-century European scholars that it became one of the two central theories of knowledge advocated in the later Middle Ages.Robert Grosseteste's Commentarius in Posteriorum Analyticorum Libro , written in the 1220s, is most likely the first complete Latin commentary on the Posterior Analytics. 3 As such, it offers us unique insight into the crucial period in which the work was gaining an audience in the Latin West. The story of its later reception is well-known: as the thirteenth century wore on, Aristotle's account of human cognition was generally set in opposition to the Augustinian-influenced theory of divine illumination that was de rigueur in the early thirteenth century, with Franciscans such as Roger.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Michael Glanzberg, Truth. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Simon Oliver (2004). Robert Grosseteste on Light, Truth and Experimentum. Vivarium 42 (2):151-180.
Margo Laasberg (2008). Deflationary Truth and Truth-Biology. Studia Philosophica Estonica 1 (2):265-283.
Fraser MacBride (2002). The Problem of Universals and the Limits of Truth-Making. Philosophical Papers 31 (1):27-37.
Christina Van Dyke (2009). An Aristotelian Theory of Divine Illumination: Robert Grosseteste's Commentary on the Posterior Analytics. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 17 (4):685-704.
Richard Heck & Robert May (forthcoming). Truth in Frege. In M. Glanzberg (ed.), Oxford Handbook of Truth. Oxford University Press
Donald Davidson (2005). Truth and Predication. Harvard University Press.
Richard James Campbell (2011). The Concept of Truth. Palgrave Macmillan.
Added to index2010-03-31
Total downloads363 ( #5,088 of 1,906,957 )
Recent downloads (6 months)104 ( #2,469 of 1,906,957 )
How can I increase my downloads?