Utility and language generation: The case of vagueness [Book Review]
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Philosophical Logic 38 (6):607-632 (2009)
This paper asks why information should ever be expressed vaguely, re-assessing some previously proposed answers to this question and suggesting some new ones. Particular attention is paid to the benefits that vague expressions can have in situations where agreement over the meaning of an expression cannot be taken for granted. A distinction between two different versions of the above-mentioned question is advocated. The first asks why human languages contain vague expressions, the second question asks when and why a speaker should choose a vague expression when communicating with a hearer. While the former question is purely theoretical, the latter has practical implications for the computational generation of utterances in Natural Language Generation (NLG).
|Keywords||Vagueness Language generation Utility|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
H. L. A. Hart (1994). The Concept of Law. Oxford University Press.
David Lewis (1969). Convention: A Philosophical Study. Harvard University Press.
Richard Jeffrey (1983). The Logic of Decision. University of Chicago Press.
David R. Hilbert (1987). Color and Color Perception: A Study in Anthropocentric Realism. Csli Press.
Citations of this work BETA
Cailin O'Connor (2013). The Evolution of Vagueness. Erkenntnis (S4):1-21.
Similar books and articles
Stewart Shapiro (2006/2008). Vagueness in Context. Oxford University Press.
Kees van Deemter, Albert Gatt, Ielka van der Sluis & Richard Power (2011). Generation of Referring Expressions: Assessing the Incremental Algorithm. Cognitive Science 36 (5):799-836.
Kees van Deemter, Finetuning NLG Through Experiments with Human Subjects: The Case of Vague Descriptions.
Dennis Earl (2010). Vague Analysis. Metaphysica 11 (2):223-233.
Rosanna Keefe (2000). Theories of Vagueness. Cambridge University Press.
Scott Soames (2012). Vagueness in the Law. In Marmor Andrei (ed.), The Routledge Companion to Philosophy of Law. Routledge 95.
Stephen Schiffer (2010). Vague Properties. In Richard Dietz & Sebastiano Moruzzi (eds.), Cuts and Clouds: Vagueness, its Nature, and its Logic. Oxford University Press 109--130.
Added to index2009-10-14
Total downloads17 ( #156,877 of 1,725,153 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #210,933 of 1,725,153 )
How can I increase my downloads?