David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Ethical Perspectives 6 (3):268-276 (1999)
Williams's comments raise the questions I'll here address: what sort of wes are there?, what goes with the 'we of science and logic'?, and what goes with the 'parochial us'? The quotations from Williams suggest that there are two wes, the contrastive and inclusive we.
|Keywords||we forms of life first encounters|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Rachel Cooper (2004). Can Sociologists Understand Other Forms of Life? Perspectives on Science 12 (1):29-54.
Anna Deplazes-Zemp (2012). The Conception of Life in Synthetic Biology. Science and Engineering Ethics 18 (4):757-774.
Fabian Andres Ballesteros Gallego, Sanctity of Life : Exploring its Significance in Modern Medicine and Bioethics.
D. Z. Phillips (1995). Mysticism and Epistemology. Faith and Philosophy 12 (2):167-188.
Maija Kule (2008). Hermeneutics of Contemporary Life Forms. Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 21:39-44.
Kristian Urstad, Pleasure in Plato's Phaedo. Philosophical Pathways.
John Wilson (1998). Two Aspects of Morality. Journal of Moral Education 27 (1):35-46.
Norman H. Packard & Mark A. Bedau (2003). Artificial Life. In L. Nadel (ed.), Encyclopedia of Cognitive Science. Nature Publishing Group. 505-512.
Added to index2010-09-02
Total downloads10 ( #152,266 of 1,099,989 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #127,210 of 1,099,989 )
How can I increase my downloads?