David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
In G. Dorffner (ed.), Konnektionismus in Artificial Intelligence Und Kognitionsforschung. Berlin: Springer-Verlag (1990)
There are many conflicting views concerning the nature of distributed representation, its compatibility or otherwise with symbolic representation, and its importance in characterizing the nature of connectionist models and their relationship to more traditional symbolic approaches to understanding cognition. Many have simply assumed that distribution is merely an implementation issue, and that symbolic mechanisms can be designed to take advantage of the virtues of distribution if so desired. Others, meanwhile, see the use of distributed representation as marking a fundamental difference between the two approaches. One reason for this diversity of opinion is the fact that the relevant notions - especially that of
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
John Sutton (2004). Representation, Levels, and Context in Integrational Linguistics and Distributed Cognition. Language Sciences (6):503-524.
A. Mike Burton (2000). The Many Ways to Distribute Distributed Representations. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (4):472-473.
Heiner Bielefeldt (2003). Symbolic Representation in Kant's Practical Philosophy. Cambridge University Press.
David Kirsh (2009). Problem Solving and Situated Cognition. In Philip Robbins & M. Aydede (eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Situated Cognition. Cambridge. 264--306.
Jiajie Zhang & Vimla L. Patel (2006). Distributed Cognition, Representation, and Affordance. Pragmatics and Cognition 14 (2):333-341.
R. C. Lacher (1993). Expert Networks: Paradigmatic Conflict, Technological Rapproachement. [REVIEW] Minds and Machines 3 (1):53-71.
John Hawthorne (1989). On the Compatibility of Connectionist and Classical Models. Philosophical Psychology 2 (1):5-16.
Tim van Gelder (1991). What is the D in PDP? In William Ramsey, Stephen P. Stich & D. Rumelhart (eds.), Philosophy and Connectionist Theory. Lawrence Erlbaum.
Chris Eliasmith, Structure Without Symbols: Providing a Distributed Account of High-Level Cognition.
Tim van Gelder (1999). Distributed Vs. Local Representation. In R. A. Wilson & F. C. Keil (eds.), The Mit Encyclopedia of the Cognitive Sciences. Mit Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads36 ( #68,751 of 1,696,650 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #345,998 of 1,696,650 )
How can I increase my downloads?