Noûs 29 (2):139-157 (1995)
|Abstract||The word "world" has in fact many ordinary uses as a count noun; I shall discuss some of them below.(2) There is however also a distinctive philosophical use found in recent ontology (in the sense in which Quine reintroduced this term in analytic philosophy, for theories about what there is). As to this philosophical use, I shall argue that there is no reason to think that it refers to anything, if indeed it is intelligible at all|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Paul R. Thagard (1997). Coherent and Creative Conceptual Combinations. In T.B. Ward, S.M Smith & J. Viad (eds.), Creative Thought: An Investigation of Conceptual Structures and Processes. American Psychological Association.
Henry Laycock, Object. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Xiaomei Yang (2011). Do Differences in Grammatical Form Between Languages Explain Differences in Ontology Between Different Philosophical Traditions?: A Critique of the Mass-Noun Hypothesis. Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 10 (2):149-166.
Gennaro Chierchia (2010). Mass Nouns, Vagueness and Semantic Variation. Synthese 174 (1).
Friederike Moltmann (2004). Properties and Kinds of Tropes: New Linguistic Facts and Old Philosophical Insights. Mind 113 (449):1-41.
Bas C. Van Fraassen (1995). `World' Is Not a Count Noun. Noûs 29 (2):139 - 157.
Henry Laycock (2005). 'Mass Nouns, Count Nouns and Non-Count Nouns'. In Alex Barber (ed.), Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics. Elsevier.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads25 ( #49,684 of 549,697 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #37,450 of 549,697 )
How can I increase my downloads?