Why the connection argument doesn't work
Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 55 (1):201-7 (1995)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | Biology Body Consciousness Mind Science Searle, J | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,705 |
| External links | This entry has no external links. Add one. |
| Through your library | Configure |
Larry Hauser, Searle's Chinese Room Argument. Field Guide to the Philosophy of Mind.
Brian J. Garrett (1995). Non-Reductionism and John Searle's The Rediscovery of the Mind. [REVIEW] Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 55 (1):209-215.
Alan D. Code (1991). Aristotle, Searle, and the Mind-Body Problem. In Ernest Lepore & Robert Van Gulick (eds.), John Searle and His Critics. Cambridge: Blackwell.
Jerry A. Fodor & Ernest Lepore (1994). What is the Connection Principle? Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 54 (4):837-45.
Robert Van Gulick (1995). Review: Why the Connection Argument Doesn't Work. [REVIEW] Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 55 (1):201 - 207.
Andrew Melnyk (1996). Searle's Abstract Argument Against Strong AI. Synthese 108 (3):391-419.
John R. Searle (1995). Consciousness, the Brain and the Connection Principle: A Reply. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 55 (1):217-232.
Pierre Jacob (1995). Consciousness, Intentionality, and Function: What is the Right Order of Explanation? Philosophy And Phenomenological Research 55 (1):195-200.
Wolfgang Barz (2007). Is There a Conceptual Connection Between Intentionality and Consciousness? Acta Analytica 22 (3):183-188.
Kirk A. Ludwig (1993). A Dilemma for Searle's Argument for the Connection Principle. Behavioral And Brain Sciences 16:194-5.
Monthly downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
|
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads0Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |

