David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Acta Analytica 17 (1):11 - 17 (2002)
This paper considers two “mysteries” having to do with vagueness. The first pertains to existence. An argument is presented for the following conclusion: there are possible cases in which ‘There exists something that is F’ is of indeterminate truth-value and with respect to which it is not assertable that there are borderline-cases of “being F.” It is contended that we have no conception of vagueness that makes this result intelligible. The second mystery has to do with “ordinary” vague predicates, such as ‘tall’. An argument is presented for the conclusion that although there are people who are “tall to degree 1”—definitely tall, tall without qualification—, no greatest lower bound can be assigned to the set of numbers n such that a man who is n centimeters tall is tall to degree 1. But, since this set is bounded from below, this result seems to contradict a well-known property of the real numbers.
|Keywords||vagueness borderline cases sorites existence composition|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Alice Kyburg (2000). When Vague Sentences Inform: A Model of Assertability. Synthese 124 (2):175-191.
P. Louhiala (2007). How Tall is Too Tall? On the Ethics of Oestrogen Treatment for Tall Girls. Journal of Medical Ethics 33 (1):48-50.
Diana Raffman (2009). Demoting Higher-Order Vagueness. In Sebastiano Moruzzi & Richard Dietz (eds.), Cuts and Clouds. Vaguenesss, its Nature and its Logic. Oxford University Press 509--22.
Delia Graff Fara (2011). Truth in a Region. In Paul Egre & Nathan Klinedinst (eds.), Vagueness and Language Use. Palgrave Macmillan
Stewart Shapiro (2006). Vagueness in Context. Oxford University Press.
Diana Raffman (2005). Borderline Cases and Bivalence. Philosophical Review 114 (1):1-31.
Rosanna Keefe (1998). Vagueness by Numbers. Mind 107 (427):565-579.
Peter Inwagen (2002). Why Vagueness is a Mystery. Acta Analytica 17 (2):11-17.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads84 ( #51,953 of 1,911,593 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #144,066 of 1,911,593 )
How can I increase my downloads?