David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Studia Universitatis Babes-Bolyai - Philosophia (1-2):29-48 (2008)
The influence of Brentano on the emergence of Husserl's notion of intentionality has been usually perceived as the key of understanding the history of intentionality, since Brentano was credited with the discovery of intentionality, and Husserl was his discipline. This much debated question is to be revisited in the present essay by incorporating recent advances in Brentano scholarship and by focusing on Husserl's very first work, his habilitation essay (Über den Begriff der Zahl), which followed immediately after his study years at Brentano, and also on manuscript notes from the same period. It is to be shown that (i) although Brentano failed to enact a direct influence on Husserl's notion of intentionality (much in line with K. Schuhmann's claim), (ii) yet the core of Brentano's notion remained operative in Husserl's theory of relations, which is seemingly influenced by John Stuart Mill and Hermann Lotze. This investigation is intended as a contribution towards the proper understanding of the complexities of Husserl's early philosophy.
|Keywords||intentionality history of theory of relations Edmund Husserl Franz Clemens Brentano John Stuart Mill Hermann Lotze|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Uwe Meixner (2006). Classical Intentionality. Erkenntnis 65 (1):25-45.
Herman Philipse (1986). The Concept of Intentionality. Philosophy Research Archives 12:293-328.
George Bealer (1996). Materialism and the Logical Structure of Intentionality. In Howard Robinson (ed.), Objections to Physicalism. New York: Clarendon Press
Edmund Runggaldier (1989). On the Scholastic or Aristotelian Roots of “Intentionality” in Brentano. Topoi 8 (2):97-103.
Carlo Ierna (2008). Husserl's Critique of Double Judgments. In Filip Mattens (ed.), Meaning and Language: Phenomenological Perspectives. Springer 49--73.
Stephen F. Barker (1982). Intensionality and Intentionality. Philosophy Research Archives 8:95-109.
Dermot Moran (2000). Heidegger's Critique of Husserl's and Brentano's Accounts of Intentionality. Inquiry 43 (1):39 – 65.
Linda L. McAlister (ed.) (1976). The Philosophy of Brentano. Humanities Press.
Carlo Ierna (2009). Relations in the Early Works of Meinong and Husserl. Meinong Studies 3:7-36.
Jacek Pasniczek (1996). The Relational Vs. Directional Conception of Intentionality. In Anna Zeidler-Janiszewska (ed.), Epistemology and History. Amsterdam: Rodopi 373-380.
Added to index2009-03-16
Total downloads145 ( #25,816 of 1,907,402 )
Recent downloads (6 months)14 ( #45,449 of 1,907,402 )
How can I increase my downloads?