Beth too, but only if
Analysis 65 (287):224–229 (2005)
| Abstract | On the difficulty of extracting the logical form of a seemingly simple sentence such as ‘If Andy went to the movie then Beth went too, but only if she found a taxi cab’, with some morals and questions on the nature of the difficulty. | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,631 |
| External links |
|
| Through your library | Configure |
E. W. Beth (1936). Some Remarks on Dr. Perelman's Essay on Logical Antinomies. Mind 45 (180):487-488.
W. J. Blok & Eva Hoogland (2006). The Beth Property in Algebraic Logic. Studia Logica 83 (1-3):49 - 90.
M. Aiguier & F. Barbier (2007). An Institution-Independent Proof of the Beth Definability Theorem. Studia Logica 85 (3):333 - 359.
Luca Bellotti (2007). Formalization, Syntax and the Standard Model of Arithmetic. Synthese 154 (2):199 - 229.
Larisa Maksimova (2006). Projective Beth Property in Extensions of Grzegorczyk Logic. Studia Logica 83 (1-3):365 - 391.
Finn V. Jensen (1974). Interpolation and Definability in Abstract Logics. Synthese 27 (1-2):251 - 257.
Bas C. Van Fraassen (1970). On the Extension of Beth's Semantics of Physical Theories. Philosophy of Science 37 (3):325 - 339.
Eva Hoogland (2000). Algebraic Characterizations of Various Beth Definability Properties. Studia Logica 65 (1):91-112.
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads8 ( #122,917 of 548,976 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,511 of 548,976 )How can I increase my downloads? |

