David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Science and Engineering Ethics 14 (1):65-76 (2008)
Services of ethics consultants are nowadays commonly used in such various spheres of life as engineering, public administration, business, law, health care, journalism, and scientific research. It has however been maintained that use of ethics consultants is incompatible with personal autonomy; in moral matters individuals should be allowed to make their own decisions. The problem this criticism refers to can be conceived of as a conflict between the professional autonomy of ethics experts and the autonomy of the persons they serve. This paper addresses this conflict and maintains that when the nature of both ethics consultation and individual autonomy is properly understood, the professional autonomy of ethics experts is compatible with the autonomy of the persons they assist.
|Keywords||Ethics consultation Ethical expertise Individual autonomy Professional autonomy Moral problems|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
J. F. Catherwood (2000). An Argument for Intolerance. Journal of Medical Ethics 26 (6):427-431.
John Christman (2004). Relational Autonomy, Liberal Individualism, and the Social Constitution of Selves. Philosophical Studies 117 (1-2):143-164.
Christopher Cowley (2005). A New Rejection of Moral Expertise. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 8 (3):273-279.
Roger Crisp (2006). Reasons and the Good. Clarendon Press.
Jonathan Dancy (2004). Ethics Without Principles. Oxford University Press.
Citations of this work BETA
A. van Gorp & S. van der Molen (2011). Parallel, Embedded or Just Part of the Team: Ethicists Cooperating Within a European Security Research Project. Science and Engineering Ethics 17 (1):31-43.
Similar books and articles
Jukka Varelius (2003). Autonomy, Subject-Relativity, and Subjective and Objective Theories of Well-Being in Bioethics. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 24 (5):363-379.
Jean Keller (1997). Autonomy, Relationality, and Feminist Ethics. Hypatia 12 (2):152-164.
Gerald Dworkin (1988). The Theory and Practice of Autonomy. Cambridge University Press.
Joseph Chan (2002). Moral Autonomy, Civil Liberties, and Confucianism. Philosophy East and West 52 (3):281-310.
George J. Agich (1993). Autonomy and Long-Term Care. Oxford University Press.
Marian A. Verkerk (2001). The Care Perspective and Autonomy. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 4 (3):289-294.
James Stacey Taylor (ed.) (2008). Personal Autonomy: New Essays on Personal Autonomy and its Role in Contemporary Moral Philosophy. Cambridge Univ Pr.
Michael D. Coughlin & John Watts (1993). A Descriptive Study of Healthcare Ethics Consultants in Canada: Results of a National Survey. [REVIEW] HEC Forum 5 (3):144-164.
Michael Davis (1996). Professional Autonomy. Business Ethics Quarterly 6 (4):441-460.
Sheila McLean (2010). Autonomy, Consent and the Law. Routledge-Cavendish.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads17 ( #98,867 of 1,102,718 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #296,833 of 1,102,718 )
How can I increase my downloads?