David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
The Monist 79 (1):89-116 (1996)
In the first part we consider some difficulties that arise as we move from the analysis of spatio- temporal regions to that of their natural occupants, such as physical bodies or events. In the second part we focus on the latter and we give a refined formulation of our argument to the effect that the temporal dimension can be directly construed from a domain of events in terms of the basic mereotopological relations of parthood and boundary.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Eric T. Olson (2006). Temporal Parts and Timeless Parthood. Noûs 40 (4):738–752.
Elias E. Savellos (2000). When Are Events Parts? Philosophical Papers 29 (3):223-247.
Philippe Chuard (2011). Temporal Experiences and Their Parts. Philosophers' Imprint 11 (11).
Fabio Pianesi & Achille C. Varzi (1996). Refining Temporal Reference in Event Structures. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 37 (1):71-83.
Fabio Pianesi & Achille C. Varzi (1996). Events, Topology and Temporal Relations. The Monist 79 (1):89--116.
Alex Lascarides & Nicholas Asher (1993). Temporal Interpretation, Discourse Relations and Commonsense Entailment. Linguistics and Philosophy 16 (5):437 - 493.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads28 ( #61,664 of 1,100,730 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #58,476 of 1,100,730 )
How can I increase my downloads?