The best question
Journal of Philosophical Logic 30 (3):251-258 (2001)
| Abstract | The Paradox of the Question’ Ned Markosian tells a tale in which philosophers have a chance to ask an angel a question of their choice. What should they ask to make the most of their unique opportunity? Ted Sider has suggested asking: What is the true proposition (or one of the true propositions) that would be most beneficial for us to be told? I think we can do much better than that. | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,631 |
| External links |
  Try with proxy. Try with proxy. |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesNed Markosian (1999). A Compatibilist Version of the Theory of Agent Causation. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 80 (3):257-277.
Ned Markosian (1998). Simples. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 76 (2):213 – 228.
Alvin Plantinga (1995). What's The Question? Journal of Philosophical Research 20:19-43.
Kris McDaniel (2003). Against Maxcon Simples. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 81 (2):265 – 275.
Ryan Wasserman & Dennis Whitcomb (2011). The Paradox of the Question. Philosophical Studies 154 (1):149-159.
Ned Markosian (1997). The Paradox of the Question. Analysis 57 (2):95–97.
Kevin C. Klement, Russell-Myhill Paradox. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads13 ( #87,789 of 548,972 )Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
