Philosophical Quarterly 58 (230):108 - 133 (2008)
|Abstract||I focus on three mereological pnnciples: the extensionality of parthood (EP), the uniqueness of composition (UC), and the extensionality of composition (EC). These pnnciples are not equivalent. Nevertheless they are closely related (and often equated), since they all reflect the basic nominalistic dictum No difference without a difference maker'. All of them, individually or collectively, have been challenged on philosophical grounds. In the first part I argue that such challenges do not quite threaten (EP), because they are either self-defeating or unsupported. In the second part I argue that they do little to undermine the tenability of(UC) and (EC) either|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Katherine Hawley (2004). Borderline Simple or Extremely Simple. The Monist 87 (3):385-404.
Matthew H. Slater (2003). Minimalism and Coincidence: Comments on Varzi. Dialectica 57 (3):323–329.
Pawel Garbacz (2007). A First Order Theory of Functional Parthood. Journal of Philosophical Logic 36 (3):309 - 337.
Thomas Mormann (2010). Structural Universals as Structural Parts: Toward a General Theory of Parthood and Composition. [REVIEW] Axiomathes 20 (2 -3):229 - 253.
Kris McDaniel (2010). Parts and Wholes. Philosophy Compass 5 (5):412-425.
Aaron J. Cotnoir (2010). Anti-Symmetry and Non-Extensional Mereology. Philosophical Quarterly 60 (239):396-405.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads37 ( #36,899 of 722,681 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,006 of 722,681 )
How can I increase my downloads?