The Extensionality of Parthood and Composition

Philosophical Quarterly 58 (230):108 - 133 (2008)
I focus on three mereological pnnciples: the extensionality of parthood (EP), the uniqueness of composition (UC), and the extensionality of composition (EC). These pnnciples are not equivalent. Nevertheless they are closely related (and often equated), since they all reflect the basic nominalistic dictum No difference without a difference maker'. All of them, individually or collectively, have been challenged on philosophical grounds. In the first part I argue that such challenges do not quite threaten (EP), because they are either self-defeating or unsupported. In the second part I argue that they do little to undermine the tenability of(UC) and (EC) either
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 10,986
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Citations of this work BETA
Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

38 ( #44,788 of 1,100,986 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #290,065 of 1,100,986 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.