Varner, Gary E. "do species have standing?" Environmental ethics 9 (1987): Pp. 57-72
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
In his recent article Should Trees Have Standing? Revisited" Christopher D. Stone has effectively withdrawn his proposal that natural objects be granted legal rights, in response to criticism from the Feinberg/McCloskey camp. Stone now favors a weaker proposal that natural objects be granted what he calls legal "considerateness". I argue that Stone's retreat is both unnecessary and undesirable. I develop the notion of a "de facto" legal right and argue that species already have de facto legal rights as statutory beneficiaries of the "Endangered Species Act of 1973." I conclude that granting certain nonhuman natural entities legal rights is both more important and less costly that Stone and his critics have realized, and that it is not Stone's original proposal which needs rethinking, but the concept of interests at work in the Feinberg/McCloskey position.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library||
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Christopher D. Stone (1987). Legal Rights and Moral Pluralism. Environmental Ethics 9 (3):281-284.
Gary E. Varner (1998). A Wolf in the Garden: The Land Rights Movement and the New Environmental Debate. Environmental Ethics 20 (4):441-443.
J. Baird Callicott & William Grove-Fanning (2009). Should Endangered Species Have Standing? Toward Legal Rights for Listed Species. Social Philosophy and Policy 26 (2):317-352.
J. Baird Callicott (2009). The Convergence Hypothesis Falsified: Implicit Intrinsic Value, Operational Rights, and de Facto Standing in the Endangered Species Act. In Ben A. Minteer (ed.), Nature in Common?: Environmental Ethics and the Contested Foundations of Environmental Policy. Temple University Press
Gary E. Varner (1998). In Nature's Interests?: Interests, Animal Rights, and Environmental Ethics. Oxford University Press.
Rick O'Neil (1997). Intrinsic Value, Moral Standing, and Species. Environmental Ethics 19 (1):45-52.
Christopher D. Stone (2010). Should Trees Have Standing?: Law, Morality, and the Environment. OUP Usa.
Jay E. Kantor (1980). The “Interests” of Natural Objects. Environmental Ethics 2 (2):163-171.
G. E. Varner (1987). Do Species Have Standing? Environmental Ethics 9 (1):57-72.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads3 ( #643,926 of 1,934,558 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?