On Dipesh Chakrabarty's Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial Thought and Historical Difference and Ranajit Guha's Dominance without Hegemony: History and Power in Colonial India
Historical Materialism 12 (2):189-247 (2004)
|Abstract||This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
James Mills (2000). The Mad and the Past: Retrospective Diagnosis, Post-Coloniality, Discourse Analysis and the Asylum Archive. [REVIEW] Journal of Medical Humanities 21 (3):141-158.
Radha D'Souza, At the Confluence of Law and Geography: Contextualising Inter-State Water Disputes in India.
Daniel Carey & Lynn Festa (eds.) (2009). The Postcolonial Enlightenment: Eighteenth-Century Colonialism and Postcolonial Theory. OUP Oxford.
Carola Dietze (2008). 1. Toward a History on Equal Terms: A Discussion of Provincializing Europe. History and Theory 47 (1):69–84.
Dipesh Chakrabarty (1999). Nation and Imagination: The Training of the Eye in Bengali Modernity. Topoi 18 (1):29-47.
Dipesh Chakrabarty (2007). History and the Politics of Recognition. In Keith Jenkins, Sue Morgan & Alun Munslow (eds.), Manifestos for History. Routledge.
Dipesh Chakrabarty (2006). A Global and Multicultural "Discipline" of History? History and Theory 45 (1):101–109.
Dipesh Chakrabarty (2008). 2. In Defense of Provincializing Europe: A Response to Carola Dietze. History and Theory 47 (1):85–96.
Added to index2010-08-10
Total downloads7 ( #142,233 of 722,753 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,247 of 722,753 )
How can I increase my downloads?