Graduate studies at Western
Sophia 46 (2):177-187 (2007)
|Abstract||Recent studies provide some support for the idea that prayer has curative powers. It is argued that even if prayers are effective in these kinds of cases it cannot be because God is answering them. While many have challenged theological explanations for the efficacy of prayer on epistemic grounds, the argument presented here concludes that the theological explanation conflicts with the standard conception of God. In particular, if God answers prayers in these kinds of cases then God is immoral.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Charles Billingsley (2009). God Laughs: And Other Surprising Things You Never Knew About Him. Regal Books.
J. Vernon McGee (1999). Who is God?: Bringing the Infinite Into Focus. Thomas Nelson Publ..
Kevin Timpe (2005). Prayers for the Past. Religious Studies 41 (3):305 - 322.
Eric Metaxas (2005). Everything You Always Wanted to Know About God (but Were Afraid to Ask). Waterbrook Press.
David Basinger (1995). Petitionary Prayer: A Response to Murray and Meyers. Religious Studies 31 (4):475 - 484.
Alexandre Guilherme (2012). God as Thou and Prayer as Dialogue: Martin Buber's Tools for Reconciliation. [REVIEW] Sophia 51 (3):365-378.
Peter Forrest (1998). Answers to Prayers and Conditional Situations. Faith and Philosophy 15 (1):41-51.
Michael Veber (2009). Reply on Behalf of Joe. Sophia 48 (4):461-465.
W. Paul Franks (2009). Why a Believer Could Believe That God Answers Prayers. Sophia 48 (3):319-324.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads21 ( #65,605 of 750,298 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #62,995 of 750,298 )
How can I increase my downloads?