Defaults in update semantics
Journal of Philosophical Logic 25 (3):221 - 261 (1996)
| Abstract | The aim of this paper is twofold: (i) to introduce the framework of update semantics and to explain what kind of semantic phenomena may successfully be analysed in it: (ii) to give a detailed analysis of one such phenomenon: default reasoning. | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,701 |
| External links |
  Try with proxy. |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesHenk Zeevat (1992). Presupposition and Accommodation in Update Semantics. Journal of Semantics 9 (4):379-412.
Wiebe van der Hoek, John-Jules Meyer & Jan Treur (1998). Temporalizing Epistemic Default Logic. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 7 (3):341-367.
Paolo Liberatore (2007). Consistency Defaults. Studia Logica 86 (1):89 - 110.
Frank Veltman (2005). Making Counterfactual Assumptions. Journal of Semantics 22 (2):159-180.
Jaap van Der Does, Willem Groeneveld & Frank Veltman (1997). An Update on ÂMightâ. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 6 (4):361-380.
Jaap van der Does, Willem Groeneveld & Frank Veltman (1997). An Update on “Might”. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 6 (4).
Alvaro Vadell & Yoav Shoham (1994). Deriving Properties of Belief Update From Theories of Action. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 3 (2).
Frank Veltman (1996). ``Defaults in Update Semantics&Quot. Journal of Philosophical Logic 25:221-261.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads51 ( #20,538 of 549,092 )Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #19,228 of 549,092 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
