In David Velleman (ed.), The Possibility of Practical Reason. Oxford University Press (2000)
|Abstract||This paper explores the sense in which belief "aims at the truth". In this course of this exploration, it discusses the difference between belief and make-believe, the nature of psychoanalytic explanation, the supposed "normativity of meaning", and related topics|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Daniel Whiting (forthcoming). Nothing but the Truth: On the Norms and Aims of Belief. In Timothy Chan (ed.), The Aim of Belief.
Asbjørn Steglich-Petersen (2006). No Norm Needed: On the Aim of Belief. Philosophical Quarterly 56 (225):499–516.
David Papineau (forthcoming). There Are No Norms of Belief. In T. Chan (ed.), The Aim of Belief.
David J. Owens (2003). Does Belief Have an Aim? Philosophical Studies 115 (3):283-305.
Conor McHugh (2012). Belief and Aims. Philosophical Studies 160 (3):425-439.
Asbjørn Steglich-Petersen (2009). Weighing the Aim of Belief. Philosophical Studies 145 (3):395 - 405.
Masahiro Yamada (2012). Taking Aim at the Truth. Philosophical Studies 157 (1):47-59.
Conor Mchugh (2011). What Do We Aim At When We Believe? Dialectica 65 (3):369-392.
Daniel Whiting (2012). Does Belief Aim (Only) at the Truth? Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 93 (2):279-300.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads349 ( #283 of 549,068 )
Recent downloads (6 months)32 ( #1,291 of 549,068 )
How can I increase my downloads?