Graduate studies at Western
Mind 101 (403):461 - 481 (1992)
|Abstract||What happens when someone acts? A familiar answer goes like this. There is something that the agent wants, and there is an action that he believes conducive to its attainment. His desire for the end, and his belief in the action as a means, justify taking the action, and they jointly cause an intention to take it, which in turn causes the corresponding movements of the agent's body. I think that the standard story is flawed in several respects. The flaw that will concern me in this paper is that the story fails to include an agent-or, more precisely, fails to cast the agent in his proper role.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Liezl van Zyl (2011). Right Action and the Non-Virtuous Agent. Journal of Applied Philosophy 28 (1):80-92.
Matthew Noah Smith (2010). Practical Imagination and its Limits. Philosophers' Imprint 10 (3).
Jeffrey Hause (2006). Aquinas on Non-Voluntary Acts. International Philosophical Quarterly 46 (4):459-475.
Hugh McCann (1995). Intention and Motivational Strength. Journal of Philosophical Research 20:571-583.
Monika Betzler (2009). Expressive Actions. Inquiry 52 (3):272-292.
J. David Velleman (1992). The Guise of the Good. Noûs 26 (1):3 - 26.
Jennifer Hornsby (2004). Agency and Alienation. Ch. In _Naturalism in Question_. Eds. M. De Caro and D. Macarthur (Harvard UP):173-87.
Donald Davidson (1970). How Is Weakness of the Will Possible? In Joel Feinberg (ed.), Moral Concepts. Oxford University Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads256 ( #927 of 739,396 )
Recent downloads (6 months)21 ( #6,075 of 739,396 )
How can I increase my downloads?