David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Foundations of Chemistry 10 (3):167-176 (2008)
Two different models for chemical bond were developed almost simultaneously after the Schrödinger formulation of quantum theory. These are known as the valence bond (VB) and molecular orbital (MO) theories. Initially chemists preferred the VB theory and ignored the MO theory. Now the VB theory is almost dropped out of currency. The context of discovery and Linus Pauling’s overpowering influence gave the VB theory its initial advantage. The current universal acceptance of the MO theory is due to its ability to provide direct interpretation of many different types of experiments now being pursued. In current research both localized bonds and delocalized charge distributions play important roles and the MO theory has been successful in giving a good account of both.
|Keywords||Chemical bond Linus Pauling R. S. Mulliken Valence bond theory Molecular orbital theory|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Hinne Hettema (2000). Quantum Chemistry: Classical Scientific Papers. World Scientific.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Michael Weisberg (2008). Challenges to the Structural Conception of Chemical Bonding. Philosophy of Science 75 (5):932-946.
Robin Findlay Hendry (2008). Two Conceptions of the Chemical Bond. Philosophy of Science 75 (5):909-920.
G. S. (1999). Dynamics of Theory Change in Chemistry: Part 1. The Benzene Problem 1865-1945. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 30 (1):21-79.
G. S. (1999). Dynamics of Theory Change in Chemistry: Part 2. Benzene and Molecular Orbitals, 1945-1980. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 30 (2):263-302.
Martha L. Harris (2008). Chemical Reductionism Revisited: Lewis, Pauling and the Physico-Chemical Nature of the Chemical Bond. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 39 (1):78-90.
William Marias Malisoff (1941). Book Review:The Nature of the Chemical Bond Linus Pauling. [REVIEW] Philosophy of Science 8 (1):133-.
Hinne Hettema (2008). A Note on Michael Weisberg's: Challenges to the Structural Conception of Chemical Bonding. [REVIEW] Foundations of Chemistry 10 (2):135-142.
Jerome A. Berson (2008). Molecules with Very Weak Bonds: The Edge of Covalency. Philosophy of Science 75 (5):947-957.
Andrea I. Woody (2000). Putting Quantum Mechanics to Work in Chemistry: The Power of Diagrammatic Representation. Philosophy of Science 67 (3):627.
Eamonn Healy (2011). Heisenberg's Chemical Legacy: Resonance and the Chemical Bond. [REVIEW] Foundations of Chemistry 13 (1):39-49.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads27 ( #143,622 of 1,796,421 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #282,641 of 1,796,421 )
How can I increase my downloads?