European Journal of Philosophy 21 (2):279-299 (2013)
|Abstract||: When suggesting that we—the affluent in the developed world—are legitimate targets of defensive force due to our contribution to global poverty one is likely to be countered by one of two strategies. The first denies that we contribute to global poverty. The second seems to affirm that we contribute, and even that we have stringent contribution-based duties to address this poverty, but denies that such contribution makes forcible resistance permissible. Those in this second group employ several argumentative strategies. In this paper I investigate these strategies for denying the force-related implication of contribution to poverty. I do not argue for political violence or for the permissibility of targeting the affluent, I merely investigate a conditional: if contribution to global poverty generates stringent duties to address it, then this contribution implies permission on the part of the victims to defend themselves with force, or for third parties to use force on their behalf|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Christian Barry & Gerhard Øverland (2012). The Feasible Alternatives Thesis: Kicking Away the Livelihoods of the Global Poor. Politics, Philosophy and Economics 11 (1):97-119.
Gerhard Øverland (2005). Poverty and the Moral Significance of Contribution. Journal of Moral Philosophy 2 (3):299-315.
Alex Voorhoeve (2006). Is Poverty Our Problem? Introduction to the Forum on World Poverty and the Duty of Assistance. The Philosophers' Magazine 36:46-49.
Scott Wisor (2012). Poverty and Poverty Alleviation. In M. Juergensmeyer & H. K. Anheier (eds.), Encyclopedia of Global Studies. Sage.
Thom Brooks (2007). Punishing States That Cause Global Poverty. William Mitchell Law Review 33 (2):519-32.
Pablo Gilabert (2012). From Global Poverty to Global Equality: A Philosophical Exploration. Oxford University Press, UK.
Julio Montero (2008). Global Deprivation—Whose Duties? Some Problems with the Contribution Principle. Metaphilosophy 39 (4-5):612-620.
Varun Gauri & Jorn Sonderholm (2012). Global Poverty: Four Normative Positions. Journal of Global Ethics 8 (2-3):193-213.
Pablo Gilabert (2005). The Duty to Eradicate Global Poverty: Positive or Negative? Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 7 (5):537 - 550.
Jorn Sonderholm (2011). On the Moral Significance of Contribution to Poverty. Journal of Global Ethics 7 (3):315-319.
Scott Wisor (2012). Measuring Global Poverty: Toward a Pro-Poor Approach. Palgrave Macmillan.
Harry van der Linden (2007). Is Global Poverty a Moral Problem for Citizens of Affluent Societies? The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 1:229-234.
William A. Galston & Peter H. Hoffenberg (eds.) (2010). Poverty and Morality: Religious and Secular Perspectives. Cambridge University Press.
Keith Horton (2012). How Academics Can Help People Make Better Decisions Concerning Global Poverty. Ethics and International Affairs: 26 (2):265-278.
Christian Barry & Scott Wisor (forthcoming). Global Poverty. In Hugh LaFollette (ed.), International Encyclopedia of Ethics. Wiley-Blackwell.
Added to index2011-03-02
Total downloads18 ( #74,462 of 722,745 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #17,033 of 722,745 )
How can I increase my downloads?