Ethics and Sublimation

Ethical Perspectives 5 (3):200-209 (1998)
Abstract
In this paper I will alternate between the position of a psychoanalyst who reflects on psychoanalysis as a moral philosopher, and that of a psychoanalyst who views moral concepts from an analyst’s point of view. By psychoanalysis I mean the clinical practice and observations deriving from Freud’s ideas and theoretical constructions, as well as the necessary theoretical underpinnings on which it rests.Jungian theory and practice, though inspired by Freud, differ sharply from Freudian theory and practice — as much as Lamarck differs from Darwin. This is why Jung himself referred to his own theory as ‘analytic psychology’. To conflate them under a single category as theologians are sometimes prone to do, even before E. Drewermann, is a misleading therapeutic and scientific ecumenism. In addition, the word ‘sublimation’ occurs extremely rarely in Jung’s works and has little meaning there. The concept has no real place within his theory. While ‘God’, Shiva, Christ, the devil, the holy virgin mother, etc. may be the representative forms of innate archetypes, it is not a sublimation of drives that has raised them to the level of psychological ‘religion’.My decided choice for Freudian theory and practice rests on experience, on epistemological arguments and on philosophical-anthropological convictions. This point of view, however, does not mean that I think one should or can simply repeat Freud’s practical hints and theoretical statements. Precisely because Freud, like Newton and Darwin, was the founder of a new science, his theoretical concepts open up new fields for observation and thought. In this paper, however, I will not carry out any technical exegesis of Freud’s texts and the discussion it has inspired
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 13,290
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Similar books and articles
Ken Gemes (2009). Freud and Nietzsche on Sublimation. Journal of Nietzsche Studies 38 (1):38-59.
Clayton Crockett (2008). Inspiration, Sublimation and Speech. Philosophy in the Contemporary World 15 (2):62-71.
Philippe van Haute (1998). About Sublimation. Ethical Perspectives 5 (3):218-224.
Rudolf Bernet (1998). Sublimation et symbolisation. Revue Philosophique De Louvain 96 (4):698-709.
Gregg Horowitz (2004). Sublimation and Disappointment. Southern Journal of Philosophy 42 (S1):137-143.
Gregg Horowitz (2004). Sublimation and Disappointment. Southern Journal of Philosophy 42 (Supplement):137-143.
Sara Beardsworth (2004). Kristeva's Idea of Sublimation. Southern Journal of Philosophy 42 (S1):122-136.
Analytics

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2010-09-02

Total downloads

5 ( #259,745 of 1,679,372 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #182,933 of 1,679,372 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Start a new thread
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.