Journal of Business Ethics 81 (2):281 - 295 (2008)
|Abstract||The purpose of the present study is to investigate gender differences in the use of double standards in ethical judgements of questionable conduct instigated by business or consumers. We investigate if consumers are more critical towards unethical corporate versus consumer actions and if these double standards depend on the gender of the respondent. In the first study, we compared evaluations of four specific unethical actions [cfr. DePaulo, 1987, in: J. Saegert (ed.) Proceedings of the Division of Consumer Psychology (American Psychological Association, Washington DC)] instigated by either the consumer or the corporation. In a second study, we investigated the perception of some general consumer and corporate (un)ethical actions in addition to DePaulo’s unethical scenarios. Both researches show that females are less likely to use double standards when it comes to their own (un)ethical behaviour compared to corporate (un)ethical actions. Furthermore, gender differences in the use of double standards depend on the type of unethical behaviour. Limitations and suggestions for further research are discussed.|
|Keywords||consumer ethics double standards gender ethical evaluations ethical beliefs|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Rhea Ingram, Steven J. Skinner & Valerie A. Taylor (2005). Consumers' Evaluation of Unethical Marketing Behaviors: The Role of Customer Commitment. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 62 (3):237 - 252.
Donald C. Hubin & Karen Haely (1999). Rape and the Reasonable Man. Law and Philosophy 18 (2):113 - 139.
Derek Dalton & Marc Ortegren (2011). Gender Differences in Ethics Research: The Importance of Controlling for the Social Desirability Response Bias. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 103 (1):73-93.
C. D. & K. Haely (1999). Rape and the Reasonable Man. Law and Philosophy 18 (2):113-139.
Karen J. Maher & Jeffrey J. Bailey (1999). The Effects of Transgressor Sex on Judgments of Unethical Behavior. Journal of Business Ethics 18 (2):157 - 171.
J. A. Badenhorst (1994). Unethical Behaviour in Procurement: A Perspective on Causes and Solutions. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 13 (9):739 - 745.
Aileen Smith & Violet Rogers (2000). Ethics-Related Responses to Specific Situation Vignettes: Evidence of Gender-Based Differences and Occupational Socialization. Journal of Business Ethics 28 (1):73 - 86.
Deepak Khazanchi (1995). Unethical Behavior in Information Systems: The Gender Factor. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 14 (9):741 - 749.
Tine Bock, Iris Vermeir & Patrick Kenhove (2013). “What's the Harm in Being Unethical? These Strangers Are Rich Anyway!” Exploring Underlying Factors of Double Standards. Journal of Business Ethics 112 (2):225-240.
Azize Ergeneli & Semra Arıkan (2002). Gender Differences in Ethical Perceptions of Salespeople: An Empirical Examination in Turkey. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 40 (3):247 - 260.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads4 ( #188,971 of 722,933 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,087 of 722,933 )
How can I increase my downloads?