Religious Studies 36 (1):1-23 (2000)
|Abstract||This paper is concerned with the centrality of aspect seeing in Wittgenstein's philosophy, with some analogies between religious beliefs and aspect seeing, and with the implications of these analogies for the question of the justification of religious beliefs. If belief in God is neither a hypothesis nor a regular perceptual belief but rather a type of aspect seeing, then the kinds of proofs and justifications that are applicable to it would have to engage the non-believer in a manner that would help her experience the dawning of a new aspect. This is why the standard philosophical proofs for theism, even when accepted as valid, are likely to be unsuccessful in bringing about faith|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Hubert L. Dreyfus & Sean D. Kelly (2007). Heterophenomenology: Heavy-Handed Sleight-of-Hand. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 6 (1-2):45-55.
Michael J. Shaffer (2004). A Defeater of the Claim That Belief in God’s Existence is Properly Basic. Philo 7 (1):57-70.
Jordan Curnutt (1998). Huang on Wittgenstein on Religious Epistemology. Religious Studies 34 (1):81-89.
Andrew Koehl (2005). On Blanket Statements About the Epistemic Effects of Religious Diversity. Religious Studies 41 (4):395-414.
Byong-Chul Park (1998). Wittgenstein's Use of the Word 'Aspekt'. Synthese 115 (1):131-140.
Robert McKim (2001). Religious Ambiguity and Religious Diversity. Oxford University Press.
Hilla Jacobson (2010). Normativity Without Reflectivity: On the Beliefs and Desires of Non-Reflective Creatures. Philosophical Psychology 23 (1):75-93.
Gemma Cornelissen (2012). Belief-Based Exemptions: Are Religious Beliefs Special? Ratio Juris 25 (1):85-109.
J. J. MacIntosh (1994). Belief-in Revisited: A Reply to Williams. Religious Studies 30 (4):487 - 503.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads4 ( #178,675 of 549,087 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?