Real-world behavior as a constraint on the cognitive architecture: Comparing ACT-R and DAC in the Newell test
Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (5):624-626 (2003)
|Abstract||The Newell Test is an important step in advancing our understanding of cognition. One critical constraint is missing from this test: A cognitive architecture must be self-contained. ACT-R and connectionism fail on this account. I present an alternative proposal, called Distributed Adaptive Control (DAC), and expose it to the Newell Test with the goal of achieving a clearer specification of the different constraints and their relationships, as proposed by Anderson & Lebiere (A&L).|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Niels A. Taatgen (2003). Poppering the Newell Test. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (5):621-622.
Sylvain Sirois (2003). Rethinking Learning and Development in the Newell Test. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (5):619-620.
John R. Anderson & Christian Lebiere (2003). The Newell Test for a Theory of Cognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (5):587-601.
Peter J. Taylor (1994). Shifting Frames: From Divided to Distributed Psychologies of Scientific Agents. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1994:304 - 310.
Asim Roy (2003). The Hardest Test for a Theory of Cognition: The Input Test. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (5):618-619.
H. E. Baber (1987). How Bad Is Rape? Hypatia 2 (2):125 - 138.
P. X. Monaghan (2010). A Novel Interpretation of Plato's Theory of Forms. Metaphysica 11 (1):63-78.
J. L. Schellenberg (2005). The Hiddenness Argument Revisited (II). Religious Studies 41 (3):287 - 303.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads3 ( #213,130 of 722,745 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?