The missing link between the theory and empirics of path dependence: Conceptual clarification, testability issue, methodological implications
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Management Studies 47:736-759 (2010)
Path dependence is a central construct in social sciences, used to describe a mechanism that connects the past and the future in an abstract way. However, across disciplines, it remains unclear why path dependence sometimes occurs and sometimes not, why it sometimes lead to inefficient outcomes and sometimes not, how it differs from mere increasing returns, and how scholars can empirically support their claims on path dependence. Hence, path dependence is not yet a theory since it does not causally relate identified variables in a systematized manner. Instead, the existing literature tends to conflate path dependence as a process (i.e. history unfolding in a self-reinforcing manner) and as an outcome (i.e. a persisting state of the world with specific properties, called ‘lock-in’). This paper contributes theoretically and methodologically to tackling these issues by: (1) providing a formal definition of path dependence that disentangles process and outcome, and identifies the necessary conditions for path dependence; (2) distinguishing clearly between path dependence and other ‘history matters’ kinds of mechanisms; and (3) specifying the missing link between theoretical and empirical path dependence. In particular, we suggest moving away from historical case studies of supposedly path-dependent processes to focus on more controlled research designs such as simulations, experiments, and counterfactual investigation.
|Keywords||path dependence testability falsifiability counterfactual randomness contingency predictability increasing returns equilibrium|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Mark S. Peacock (2009). Path Dependence in the Production of Scientific Knowledge. Social Epistemology 23 (2):105 – 124.
Altug Yalcintas (2012). A Notion Evolving: From 'Institutional Path Dependence' to 'Intellectual Path Dependence. Economics Bulletin 32 (2):1092-1098.
Altug Yalcintas (2006). Historical Small Events and the Eclipse of Utopia: Perspectives on Path Dependence in Human Thought. Culture, Theory, and Critique 47 (1):53-70.
W. Y. Evans-Wentz (1968). Tibetan Yoga and Secret Doctrines. New York [Etc.],Oxford U.P..
Marion Smiley (2001). 'Welfare Dependence': The Power of a Concept. Thesis Eleven (64):21-38.
David James (2013). Rousseau on Dependence and the Formation of Political Society. European Journal of Philosophy 21 (3):343-366.
Eric Desjardins (2011). Reflections on Path Dependence and Irreversibility: Lessons From Evolutionary Biology. Philosophy of Science 78 (5):724-738.
Eric Desjardins (2011). Historicity and Experimental Evolution. Biology and Philosophy 26 (3):339-364.
Georg Aichholzer & Stefan Strauß (2010). The Austrian Case: Multi-Card Concept and the Relationship Between Citizen ID and Social Security Cards. [REVIEW] Identity in the Information Society 3 (1):65-85.
James R. Griesemer (1991). Must Scientific Diagrams Be Eliminable? The Case of Path Analysis. Biology and Philosophy 6 (2):155-180.
Frank A. Hindriks (2006). Acceptance-Dependence: A Social Kind of Response-Dependence. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 87 (4):481–498.
Benjamin Schnieder (2006). A Certain Kind of Trinity: Dependence, Substance, Explanation. Philosophical Studies 129 (2):393 - 419.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2011-10-11
Total downloads1 ( #440,892 of 1,101,678 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #292,019 of 1,101,678 )
How can I increase my downloads?