Unique transition probabilities in the modal interpretation

Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 27 (2):133-159 (1996)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1016/1355-2198(95)00004-6

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Unique transition probabilities in the modal interpretation.Pieter E. Vermaas - 1996 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 27 (2):133-159.
Unique transition probabilities in the modal interpretation.E. P. - 1996 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 27 (2):133-159.
Modal semantics, modal dynamics and the problem of state preparation.Laura Ruetsche - 2003 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 17 (1):25 – 41.
A philosopher's understanding of quantum mechanics: possibilities and impossibilities of a modal interpretation.Pieter E. Vermaas - 1999 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Possible worlds in the modal interpretation.Meir Hemmo - 1996 - Philosophy of Science 63 (3):337.
The Only Real Probabilities in Quantum Mechanics.Nancy Cartwright - 1978 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1978:54-59.
The modal interpretation of quantum mechanics and its generalization to density operators.Pieter E. Vermaas & Dennis Dieks - 1995 - Foundations of Physics 25 (1):145-158.
The modal interpretation of quantum mechanics - Dennis Dieks and Pieter E. Vermaas (eds), the modal interpretation of quantum mechanics (dordrecht: Kluwer academic, 1998), VIII+377 pp., ISBN 0-7923-5207-. [REVIEW]B. D'Espagnat - 2001 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 32 (1):121-125.
The many-worlds interpretation of quantum mechanics: Psychological versus physical bases for the multiplicity of "worlds".Howard Barnum - unknown
On the Verge of Collapse: Modal Interpretations of Quantum Mechanics.Laura Ruetsche - 1995 - Dissertation, University of Pittsburgh
“Solution” of the EPR Paradox: Negative, or Rather Fuzzy Probabilities? [REVIEW]Jarosław Pykacz - 2006 - Foundations of Physics 36 (3):437-442.
How to interpret quantum mechanics.Jeffrey Bub - 1994 - Erkenntnis 41 (2):253 - 273.
The Modal Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics.Dennis Dieks & Pieter Vermaas - 1998 - Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Anagram solution times: A function of word transition probabilities.M. S. Mayzner & M. E. Tresselt - 1962 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 63 (5):510.
Are quantum mechanical transition probabilities classical? A critique of Cartwright's interpretation of quantum theory.Vandana Shiva - 1980 - Synthese 44 (3):501 - 508.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-02-04

Downloads
19 (#753,814)

6 months
10 (#219,185)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

A modal-Hamiltonian interpretation of quantum mechanics.Olimpia Lombardi & Mario Castagnino - 2008 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 39 (2):380-443.
A modal-Hamiltonian interpretation of quantum mechanics.Olimpia Lombardi & Mario Castagnino - 2008 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 39 (2):380-443.
Whither the Minds?Jeremy Butterfield - 1996 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 47 (2):200-221.
Schwinger and the ontology of quantum field theory.Edward MacKinnon - 2007 - Foundations of Science 12 (4):295-323.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Wanted Dead or Alive: Two Attempts to Solve Schrodinger's Paradox.David Albert & Barry Loewer - 1990 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1990:277-285.

Add more references