David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
European Journal for Philosophy of Science 2 (1):1-19 (2012)
Two successes of old quantum theory are particularly notable: Bohr’s prediction of the spectral lines of ionised helium, and Sommerfeld’s prediction of the fine-structure of the hydrogen spectral lines. Many scientific realists would like to be able to explain these successes in terms of the truth or approximate truth of the assumptions which fuelled the relevant derivations. In this paper I argue that this will be difficult for the ionised helium success, and is almost certainly impossible for the fine-structure success. Thus I submit that the case against the realist’s thesis that success is indicative of truth is marginally strengthened
|Keywords||Old quantum theory Hydrogen Spectral lines Fine structure Bohr Sommerfeld Realism Spin|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
L. C. Biedenharn (1983). The “Sommerfeld Puzzle” Revisited and Resolved. Foundations of Physics 13 (1):13-34.
Anjan Chakravartty (2007). A Metaphysics for Scientific Realism: Knowing the Unobservable. Cambridge University Press.
Philip Kitcher (1993). The Advancement of Science: Science Without Legend, Objectivity Without Illusions. Oxford University Press.
Larry Laudan (1981). A Confutation of Convergent Realism. Philosophy of Science 48 (1):19-49.
Abraham Pais (1986). Inward Bound: Of Matter and Forces in the Physical World. Oxford University Press.
Citations of this work BETA
Peter Vickers (2013). A Confrontation of Convergent Realism. Philosophy of Science 80 (2):189-211.
Helge Kragh (2012). The Isotope Effect: Prediction, Discussion, and Discovery. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 43 (3):176-183.
Similar books and articles
K. Brad Wray (2013). Success and Truth in the Realism/Anti-Realism Debate. Synthese 190 (9):1719-1729.
Claudio Garola (1992). Truth Versus Testability in Quantum Logic. Erkenntnis 37 (2):197 - 222.
Gerald Doppelt (2013). Explaining the Success of Science: Kuhn and Scientific Realists. Topoi 32 (1):43-51.
Robert Garland Colodny (1972). Paradigms & Paradoxes. [Pittsburgh]University of Pittsburgh Press.
Gerald D. Doppelt (2011). From Standard Scientific Realism and Structural Realism to Best Current Theory Realism. Journal for General Philosophy of Science 42 (2):295-316.
Edward Mackinnon (1982). The Truth of Scientific Claims. Philosophy of Science 49 (3):437-462.
Juha Saatsi & Peter Vickers (2011). Miraculous Success? Inconsistency and Untruth in Kirchhoff's Diffraction Theory. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 62 (1):29-46.
Nicholas Maxwell (1994). Particle Creation as the Quantum Condition for Probabilistic Events to Occur. Physics Letters A 187 (2 May 1994):351-355.
Ioannis Votsis (2011). The Prospective Stance in Realism. Philosophy of Science 78 (5):1223-1234.
Timothy D. Lyons (2003). Explaining the Success of a Scientific Theory. Philosophy of Science 70 (5):891-901.
Arthur Fine (1996). The Shaky Game: Einstein, Realism, and the Quantum Theory. University of Chicago Press.
Jarrett Leplin (1982). The Historical Objection to Scientific Realism. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1982:88 - 97.
Added to index2010-09-18
Total downloads50 ( #33,270 of 1,102,976 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #297,509 of 1,102,976 )
How can I increase my downloads?