Graduate studies at Western
Mind and Language 20 (5):537–558 (2005)
|Abstract||According to the thesis of semantic underdetermination, most sentences of a natural language lack a definite semantic interpretation. This thesis supports an argument against the use of natural language as an instrument of thought, based on the premise that cognition requires a semantically precise and compositional instrument. In this paper we examine several ways to construe this argument, as well as possible ways out for the cognitive view of natural language in the introspectivist version defended by Carruthers. Finally, we sketch a view of the role of language in thought as a specialized tool, showing how it avoids the consequences of semantic underdetermination.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Peter Carruthers (2002). The Cognitive Functions of Language. Behavioral And Brain Sciences 25 (6):657-674.
Wolfgang Pietsch, Defending Underdetermination or Why the Historical Perspective Makes a Difference.
K. M. Darling (2002). The Complete Duhemian Underdetermination Argument: Scientific Language and Practice. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 33 (3):511-533.
Peter Carruthers (1996). Language, Thought, and Consciousness. Cambridge University Press.
Philip L. Peterson (1984). Semantic Indeterminacy and Scientific Underdetermination. Philosophy of Science 51 (3):464-487.
Douglas Patterson (2009). Inconsistency Theories of Semantic Paradox. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 79 (2):387 - 422.
Syed S. Ali & Stuart C. Shapiro (1993). Natural Language Processing Using a Propositional Semantic Network with Structured Variables. Minds and Machines 3 (4):421-451.
Berit Brogaard, Inconsistency Theories of Semantic Paradox, by Douglas Patterson. Philosopher's Digest.
Agustín Vicente & Fernando Martínez-Manrique (2008). Thought, Language, and the Argument From Explicitness. Metaphilosophy 39 (3):381–401.
Fernando Martínez Manrique & Agustín Vicente (2005). Overhearing a Sentence: Recanati and the Cognitive View of Language. Pragmatics and Cognition 12 (219):251.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads73 ( #14,073 of 740,333 )
Recent downloads (6 months)32 ( #3,647 of 740,333 )
How can I increase my downloads?