The scientific philosophy and philosophy of science (part 1)
| Abstract | It is shown that the physical terms have links with philosophical categories. If scientists ignore these ties then epistemological errors arise. The examples of such errors are considered. | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | No categories specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,709 |
| External links | This entry has no external links. Add one. |
| Through your library | Only published papers are available at libraries |
Similar books and articlesJames Blachowicz (2009). How Science Textbooks Treat Scientific Method: A Philosopher's Perspective. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 60 (2):303--344.
G. Hardcastle (1999). Are There Scientific Goals? Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 30 (3):297-311.
Pete Mandik & William Bechtel (2002). Philosophy of Science. In Lynn Nadel (ed.), The Encyclopedia of Cognitive Science. Macmillan.
Dimitri Ginev (2001). Searching for a (Post)Foundational Approach to Philosophy of Science: Part I. Journal for General Philosophy of Science 32 (1):27-37.
Nicholas Maxwell (1974). The Rationality of Scientific Discovery Part II: An Aim Oriented Theory of Scientific Discovery. Philosophy of Science 41 (3):247-295.
Jutta Schickore (2005). 'Through Thousands of Errors We Reach the Truth'—but How? On the Epistemic Roles of Error in Scientific Practice. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 36 (3):539-556.
William P. Bechtel (1982). Two Common Errors in Explaining Biological and Psychological Phenomena. Philosophy of Science 49 (December):549-574.
Analytics
Monthly downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
|
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads0Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
